Literature DB >> 8466113

The pulmonary response of white and black adults to six concentrations of ozone.

E Seal1, W F McDonnell, D E House, S A Salaam, P J Dewitt, S O Butler, J Green, L Raggio.   

Abstract

Many early studies of respiratory responsiveness to ozone (O3) were done on healthy, young, white males. The purpose of this study was to determine whether gender or race differences in O3 response exist among white and black, males and females, and to develop concentration-response curves for each of the gender-race groups. Three hundred seventy-two subjects (n > 90 in each gender-race group), ages 18 to 35 yr, were exposed once for 2.33 h to 0.0 (purified air), 0.12, 0.18, 0.24, 0.30, or 0.40 ppm O3. Each exposure was preceded by baseline pulmonary function tests and a symptom questionnaire. The first 2 h of exposure included alternating 15-min periods of rest and exercise on a motorized treadmill producing a minute ventilation (VE) of 25 L/min/m2 body surface area (BSA). After exposure, subjects completed a set of pulmonary function tests and a symptom questionnaire. Lung function and symptom responses were expressed as percent change from baseline and analyzed using a nonparametric two factor analysis of variance. Three primary variables were analyzed: FEV1, specific airway resistance (SRaw), and cough. Statistical analysis demonstrated no significant differences in response to O3 among the individual gender-race groups. For the group as a whole, changes in the variables FEV1, SRaw, and cough were first noted at 0.12, 0.18, and 0.18 ppm O3, respectively. Adjusted for exercise difference, concentration-response curves for FEV1 and cough among white males were consistent with previous reports (1).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8466113     DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm/147.4.804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis        ISSN: 0003-0805


  7 in total

1.  Pulmonary function, bronchial reactivity, and epithelial permeability are response phenotypes to ozone and develop differentially in healthy humans.

Authors:  Loretta G Que; Jane V Stiles; John S Sundy; W Michael Foster
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2011-06-23

2.  Modification of the effect of ambient air pollution on pediatric asthma emergency visits: susceptible subpopulations.

Authors:  Matthew J Strickland; Mitchel Klein; W Dana Flanders; Howard H Chang; James A Mulholland; Paige E Tolbert; Lyndsey A Darrow
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  Urban air pollution and health inequities: a workshop report.

Authors: 
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  Biomarkers of Dose and Effect of Inhaled Ozone in Resting versus Exercising Human Subjects: Comparison with Resting Rats.

Authors:  Gary E Hatch; John McKee; James Brown; William McDonnell; Elston Seal; Joleen Soukup; Ralph Slade; Kay Crissman; Robert Devlin
Journal:  Biomark Insights       Date:  2013-05-19

5.  Pulmonary epithelial integrity in children: relationship to ambient ozone exposure and swimming pool attendance.

Authors:  Birgitta Json Lagerkvist; Alfred Bernard; Anders Blomberg; Erik Bergstrom; Bertil Forsberg; Karin Holmstrom; Kjell Karp; Nils-Goran Lundstrom; Bo Segerstedt; Mona Svensson; Gunnar Nordberg
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Effect of Obesity on Acute Ozone-Induced Changes in Airway Function, Reactivity, and Inflammation in Adult Females.

Authors:  William D Bennett; Sally Ivins; Neil E Alexis; Jihong Wu; Philip A Bromberg; Sukhdev S Brar; Gregory Travlos; Stephanie J London
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Are non-allergenic environmental factors important in asthma?

Authors:  M J Abramson; G B Marks; P K Pattemore
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1995-11-20       Impact factor: 7.738

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.