Literature DB >> 8465017

Time trend of patient setup deviations during pelvic irradiation using electronic portal imaging.

A A el-Gayed1, A Bel, R Vijlbrief, H Bartelink, J V Lebesque.   

Abstract

An electronic portal imaging device (EPID) was used to detect patient setup displacement during the course of a 3-field pelvic irradiation of two groups of patients: 10 rectal and 10 prostate carcinomas. These patients were irradiated with conventional treatment techniques in routine clinical practice. A total of 469 portal images and 60 simulator films were used to determine the values of setup deviations in the X- Y- and Z-directions of a fixed coordinate system, corresponding to the medio-lateral, cranio-caudal and antero-posterior direction, respectively. The absolute displacement averaged over all setups and patients ranged between 0.4 mm and 1.4 mm with a standard deviation (S.D.) of 1.6-3.9 mm. The overall distribution along each direction could be separated into a distribution of random deviations (S.D.s ranging from 1.2 to 2.8 mm) around the mean deviation of each patient and a distribution of the means themselves: the distribution of systematic deviations (S.D.s ranging from 1.0 to 2.6 mm). Significant gradual displacement as a function of time was detected in 5 out of the 20 patients, 2 in the rectum and 3 in the prostate group. This "time trend" was found along each of the 3 directions specified. The magnitude of the time-dependent displacement throughout the course of treatment ranged between 4 and 11 mm. It can be concluded that for treatments requiring a high level of precision, portal images should be made and analyzed during the whole treatment course in order to detect and correct significant time trends.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8465017     DOI: 10.1016/0167-8140(93)90098-s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  9 in total

1.  Small bowel protection in IMRT for rectal cancer : A dosimetric study on supine vs. prone position.

Authors:  Julia Koeck; Katharina Kromer; Frank Lohr; Tobias Baack; Kerstin Siebenlist; Sabine Mai; Sylvia Büttner; Jens Fleckenstein; Frederik Wenz
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Guide to clinical use of electronic portal imaging.

Authors:  M G Herman; J J Kruse; C R Hagness
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Theoretical foundation for real-time prostate localization using an inductively coupled transmitter and a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) magnetometer system.

Authors:  John E McGary
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  A clinical evaluation of setup errors for a prostate immobilization system.

Authors:  J E McGary; W Grant
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  The potential failure risk of the cone-beam computed tomography-based planning target volume margin definition for prostate image-guided radiotherapy based on a prospective single-institutional hybrid analysis.

Authors:  Katsumi Hirose; Mariko Sato; Yoshiomi Hatayama; Hideo Kawaguchi; Fumio Komai; Makoto Sohma; Hideki Obara; Masashi Suzuki; Mitsuki Tanaka; Ichitaro Fujioka; Koji Ichise; Yoshihiro Takai; Masahiko Aoki
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Coping with interfraction time trends in tumor setup.

Authors:  Marta K Giżyńska; Paweł F Kukołowicz; Ben J M Heijmen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Immobilization versus no immobilization for pelvic external beam radiotherapy.

Authors:  Avinash H Udayashankar; Shibina Noorjahan; Nirmala Srikantia; K Ravindra Babu; Sandeep Muzumder
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2018-05-17

8.  Accuracy and reproducibility of conformal radiotherapy using data from a randomised controlled trial of conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer (MRC RT01, ISRCTN47772397).

Authors:  S Stanley; S Griffiths; M R Sydes; A R Moore; I Syndikus; D P Dearnaley
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 4.126

9.  A randomized study of the effect of patient positioning on setup reproducibility and dose distribution to organs at risk in radiotherapy of rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Trude C Frøseth; Trond Strickert; Kjersti S Solli; Øyvind Salvesen; Gunilla Frykholm; Randi J Reidunsdatter
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.481

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.