Literature DB >> 8463974

Wear of ceramic inlays, their enamel antagonists, and luting cements.

I Krejci1, F Lutz, M Reimer, J L Heinzmann.   

Abstract

The wear of ceramic inlay materials and antagonist enamel cups was measured in vitro. Per group, six MOD inlays were adhesively cemented in extracted molars. Castable glass ceramic, pressed glass ceramic, and feldspathic porcelain were used as inlay materials. A microfilled and a fine hybrid composite served as luting agents. The restorations were exposed to an in vitro wear test that corresponds to approximately 5 years of clinical service. The wear in the occlusal contact area was quantified during and at the end of the test with a three-dimensional scanner. Final wear measurements on the inlays (mean +/- SD) ranged from 21.8 +/- 8.8 microns for pressed glass ceramic to 59.0 +/- 37.9 microns for castable glass ceramic. The mean wear of the enamel antagonists ranged from 74.6 +/- 32.9 microns for pressed glass ceramic to 153.2 +/- 61.5 microns for feldspathic porcelain. The wear of the luting composites at the end of the test ranged from 4.9 +/- 5.1 microns for microfilled to 12.3 +/- 6.3 microns for fine hybrid.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8463974     DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90192-q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  8 in total

Review 1.  Clinical applications of glass-ceramics in dentistry.

Authors:  Wolfram Höland; Volker Rheinberger; Elke Apel; Christian van 't Hoen; Marlies Höland; Alex Dommann; Marcel Obrecht; Corinna Mauth; Ursula Graf-Hausner
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Are resin composites suitable replacements for amalgam? A study of two-body wear.

Authors:  Dimitra Lazaridou; Renan Belli; Anselm Petschelt; Ulrich Lohbauer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Dental materials for primary dentition: are they suitable for occlusal restorations? A two-body wear study.

Authors:  D Lazaridou; R Belli; N Krämer; A Petschelt; U Lohbauer
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2014-10-25

4.  Assessment of exposures and potential risks to the US adult population from wear (attrition and abrasion) of gold and ceramic dental restorations.

Authors:  G Mark Richardson; Scott R Clemow; Rachel E Peters; Kyle J James; Steven D Siciliano
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 5.563

5.  Adhesive restoration of anterior endodontically treated teeth: influence of post length on fracture strength.

Authors:  Anaïs Ramírez-Sebastià; Tissiana Bortolotto; Maria Cattani-Lorente; Lluis Giner; Miguel Roig; Ivo Krejci
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Effect of resin coating and chlorhexidine on microleakage of two resin cements after storage.

Authors:  F Shafie; M Doozandeh; A Alavi
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2010-03-31

7.  Wear Resistance of 3D Printing Resin Material Opposing Zirconia and Metal Antagonists.

Authors:  Ji-Man Park; Jin-Soo Ahn; Hyun-Suk Cha; Joo-Hee Lee
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Evaluating the Wear of Resin Teeth by Different Opposing Restorative Materials.

Authors:  Seunglee Jin; Jae-Won Choi; Chang-Mo Jeong; Jung-Bo Huh; So-Hyoun Lee; Hyeonjong Lee; Mi-Jung Yun
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 3.623

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.