Literature DB >> 8463575

[The value of RU-486 (mifepristone) in medical indications of the induction of labor at term. Results of a double-blind randomized prospective study (RU-486 versus placebo)].

C Lelaidier1, J L Benifla, H Fernandez, C Baton, P Bourget, M C Bourrier, R Frydman.   

Abstract

One hundred and twenty term women (> 37.5 weeks amenorrhea) with unripe cervixes (Bishop < 4) and with a clear clinical indication for labour induction were randomized to receive either mifepristone (RU 486) or placebo. The patients' regimens consisted of 200 mg of mifepristone on days 1 and 2 over an observation period of 4 days, with labour induction planned for day 4. Within 12 hours after taking the first tablet, fetal distress was diagnosed in 8 patients (3 in the Mifepristone group and 5 in the control group), who underwent immediate cesarean section. These 8 patients could not therefore participate in our survey and have been excluded from the final results. Forty one patients had spontaneous onset of labour, 31 in the mifepristone group and 10 in the control group (p < 0.001). Forty seven patients needed cervical maturation with prostaglandin, 32 from the control group and 13 from the mifepristone group (p < 0.001). Thirteen patients in each group had cervical maturation sufficient for classical labour induction. We noted that patients delivering vaginally needed significantly lower amount of oxytocin in the mefepristone group and that the mean time interval between day 1 and the onset of labour was also significantly shorter in this group. The high cesarean section rate (32%), which is equivalent in both the placebo and the treated groups, may be attributed to the fact most of the patients in this survey had high risk pregnancies. There was no difference in the occurrence of fetal distress during labour in the 2 groups. Neonatal parameters were similar in both groups. These results establish mifepristone as an induction agent for the initiation of labour in term women. Though more studies are needed, Mifepristone has shown itself to be safe and appropriate in situations where labor has to be induced in term women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8463575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)        ISSN: 0150-9918


  3 in total

1.  A Retrospective Case-Control Study Evaluating the Role of Mifepristone for Induction of Labor in Women with Previous Cesarean Section.

Authors:  Chanderdeep Sharma; Anjali Soni; Pawan K Soni; Suresh Verma; Ashok Verma; Amit Gupta
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2015-09-01

Review 2.  Mifepristone for induction of labour.

Authors:  Dharani Hapangama; James P Neilson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08

Review 3.  Progesterone is not the same as 17α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate: implications for obstetrical practice.

Authors:  Roberto Romero; Frank Z Stanczyk
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 8.661

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.