Literature DB >> 8463168

Distribution of genes encoding erythromycin ribosomal methylases and an erythromycin efflux pump in epidemiologically distinct groups of staphylococci.

E A Eady1, J I Ross, J L Tipper, C E Walters, J H Cove, W C Noble.   

Abstract

Erythromycin-resistant staphylococci can be divided into two phenotypic classes based on their pattern of cross-resistance to other macrolides, lincosamides and type B streptogramins. Strains inducibly or constitutively resistant to all MLS antibiotics possess erythromycin ribosomal methylase (erm) genes, whereas strains inducibly resistant to only 14 and 15-membered ring macrolides and type B streptogramins harbour msrA, which encodes an ATP-dependent efflux pump. Dot-blot hybridization was used to study the distribution of ermA, ermB, ermC and msrA in five epidemiologically distinct groups of staphylococci. The most widely-distributed resistance determinant was ermC, which was detected in 112 (50.6%) of 221 isolates, alone in 106 isolates and in combination with a second erythromycin resistance determinant in six strains. MsrA was detected in 73 (33%) of isolates, alone in 65 and in combination with a methylase gene in eight strains. This determinant was responsible for erythromycin resistance in over one-third (36.4%) of clinical isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci. ErmA and ermB were present in only a minority of isolates (5.9 and 7.2% of strains, respectively). The resistance determinants present in ten strains did not hybridize to any of the four probes although, in all cases, their resistance phenotype was consistent with the possession of a methylase gene. Interestingly, ermB was found exclusively in animal isolates of Staphylococcus intermedius, Staphylococcus xylosus and Staphylococcus hyicus, but not in coagulase-negative staphylococci of human origin. This determinant has previously only been found in a small number of epidemiologically related strains of Staphylococcus aureus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8463168     DOI: 10.1093/jac/31.2.211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  30 in total

Review 1.  Nomenclature for macrolide and macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance determinants.

Authors:  M C Roberts; J Sutcliffe; P Courvalin; L B Jensen; J Rood; H Seppala
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Macrolide resistance conferred by base substitutions in 23S rRNA.

Authors:  B Vester; S Douthwaite
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Molecular detection of antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  A C Fluit; M R Visser; F J Schmitz
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Distribution of genes encoding resistance to macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramins among staphylococci.

Authors:  G Lina; A Quaglia; M E Reverdy; R Leclercq; F Vandenesch; J Etienne
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Detection of inducible clindamycin resistance of staphylococci in conjunction with performance of automated broth susceptibility testing.

Authors:  J H Jorgensen; S A Crawford; M L McElmeel; K R Fiebelkorn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Prevalence and mechanism of resistance to antimicrobial agents in group G streptococcal isolates from China.

Authors:  Jun Yin; Sangjie Yu; Xiaorong Liu; Ye Li; Wei Gao; Xiang Ma; Yonghong Yang
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Correlation between the resistance genotype determined by multiplex PCR assays and the antibiotic susceptibility patterns of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Authors:  F Martineau; F J Picard; N Lansac; C Ménard; P H Roy; M Ouellette; M G Bergeron
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Selection of strains for quality assessment of the disk induction method for detection of inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococci: a CLSI collaborative study.

Authors:  Adrian M Zelazny; Mary Jane Ferraro; Anita Glennen; Janet F Hindler; Linda M Mann; Susan Munro; Patrick R Murray; L Barth Reller; Fred C Tenover; James H Jorgensen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Characterization of erythromycin-resistant isolates of Staphylococcus aureus recovered in the United States from 1958 through 1969.

Authors:  F G Nicola; L K McDougal; J W Biddle; F C Tenover
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Clinical strain of Staphylococcus aureus inactivates and causes efflux of macrolides.

Authors:  L Wondrack; M Massa; B V Yang; J Sutcliffe
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.