OBJECTIVE: Patterns of seclusion and restraint over a one-year period at 82 Veterans Affairs medical centers were examined to determine whether use of these interventions was influenced by hospital characteristics (such as geographic location, per diem cost, patient-staff ratio, and university affiliation), patient diagnoses, or reasons for use. METHODS: For comparison, medical centers were grouped into seven geographic regions and into three frequency-of-use groups. Mean use rates and hospital characteristics were examined by rank correlational analysis. RESULTS: Among hospital characteristics, only geographic location was associated with differences in use of seclusion and restraint. Mean rates of use in the Pacific and Mid-Atlantic regions were significantly lower than those in other regions. Total hours of seclusion and restraint at the 20 highest-use centers differed from those at the 20 lowest-use centers by a factor of ten. Patients with schizophrenic disorders were secluded or restrained most frequently. Centers with the highest rates used these interventions most frequently for reasons not associated with violent or potentially violent behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: The large geographic variations in use of seclusion and restraint may be a function of different standards of practice or of different state laws.
OBJECTIVE: Patterns of seclusion and restraint over a one-year period at 82 Veterans Affairs medical centers were examined to determine whether use of these interventions was influenced by hospital characteristics (such as geographic location, per diem cost, patient-staff ratio, and university affiliation), patient diagnoses, or reasons for use. METHODS: For comparison, medical centers were grouped into seven geographic regions and into three frequency-of-use groups. Mean use rates and hospital characteristics were examined by rank correlational analysis. RESULTS: Among hospital characteristics, only geographic location was associated with differences in use of seclusion and restraint. Mean rates of use in the Pacific and Mid-Atlantic regions were significantly lower than those in other regions. Total hours of seclusion and restraint at the 20 highest-use centers differed from those at the 20 lowest-use centers by a factor of ten. Patients with schizophrenic disorders were secluded or restrained most frequently. Centers with the highest rates used these interventions most frequently for reasons not associated with violent or potentially violent behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: The large geographic variations in use of seclusion and restraint may be a function of different standards of practice or of different state laws.
Authors: Elizabeth Khaykin; Daniel E Ford; Peter J Pronovost; Lisa Dixon; Gail L Daumit Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2010-06-03 Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Robert E McCue; Leonel Urcuyo; Yehezkel Lilu; Teresa Tobias; Michael J Chambers Journal: J Behav Health Serv Res Date: 2004 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 1.505
Authors: Lucie Kalisova; Jiri Raboch; Alexander Nawka; Gaia Sampogna; Libor Cihal; Thomas W Kallert; Georgi Onchev; Anastasia Karastergiou; Valeria Del Vecchio; Andrzej Kiejna; Tomasz Adamowski; Francisco Torres-Gonzales; Jorge A Cervilla; Stephan Priebe; Domenico Giacco; Lars Kjellin; Algirdas Dembinskas; Andrea Fiorillo Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2014-04-16 Impact factor: 4.328