Literature DB >> 8462144

Implantable transvenous cardioverter-defibrillators.

G H Bardy1, B Hofer, G Johnson, P J Kudenchuk, J E Poole, G L Dolack, M Gleva, R Mitchell, D Kelso.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Implantable transvenous cardioverter-defibrillators offer a significant opportunity to decrease procedural morbidity and medical costs in the care of patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias who otherwise would have required a sternotomy or thoracotomy for device insertion. The purpose of this study was to examine prospectively the safety, efficacy, and limitations associated with the use of a transvenously implanted, tiered-therapy cardioverter-defibrillator with antitachycardia pacing function in a consecutive population of 84 ventricular fibrillation (VF) and sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) survivors. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The index arrhythmia promoting transvenous cardioverter-defibrillator implantation was VF in 41 patients, VT in 27, and both VF and VT in 16. In each patient, transvenous defibrillation via a coronary sinus, a right ventricular, a superior vena caval, and/or a subcutaneous chest patch lead system was attempted. The pulsing methods used include two-electrode single-pathway pulsing or three-electrode dual-pathway simultaneous or sequential pulsing. A transvenous cardioverter-defibrillator was inserted if the defibrillation threshold (DFT) was < or = 20 J. Successful implantation of a transvenous cardioverter-defibrillator was possible in 80 of 84 (95%) patients. The mean implant DFT was 10.9 +/- 4.8 J. After cardioverter-defibrillator implantation, all patients were extubated in the operating room and sent to a standard telemetry ward for monitoring. No patient suffered a postoperative pulmonary complication or perioperative flurry of cardiac arrhythmias. Postoperative complications included lead dislodgments in eight, transient long thoracic nerve injury in one, asymptomatic left subclavian vein occlusion in two, asymptomatic small pericardial effusion in one, subcutaneous patch pocket hematomas in four, pulse generator pocket infection in one, and lead fracture in one. As experience was gained with the procedure, it was routine to discharge patients 3 days after surgery. The mean hospital stay was 6.0 +/- 2.4 days. Upon discharge, all patients returned to their prehospital activities including those with complications except for the patient with a pocket infection, who required intravenous antibiotic therapy. Patient survival using an intention-to-treat analysis was 98% over an 11 +/- 7-month follow-up period. During this time period, 31 of the 80 patients (39%) with transvenous lead systems were successfully treated by their device for sustained VT or VF. Antitachycardia pacing was used in 424 episodes of monomorphic VT and was successful in 371 (88%). All episodes of VF were aborted by the device. Antiarrhythmic drugs were used after device implantation in only eight of 80 patients (10%).
CONCLUSIONS: Transvenous cardioverter-defibrillator implantation is practical in most candidates. Implant DFTs are usually low, surgical morbidity and postoperative complications are modest, therapy of VT and VF is efficient, and survival is excellent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8462144     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.87.4.1152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  22 in total

Review 1.  Changing concepts of electrophysiology testing for ventricular arrhythmias.

Authors:  M Akhtar
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 2.  [Cardiology update. I: Electrophysiology].

Authors:  P Weismüller; H J Trappe
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1999-01-15

3.  The MADIT II and COMPANION studies: will they affect uptake of device treatment?

Authors:  J M Morgan
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 4.  The role of EP-guided therapy in ventricular arrhythmias: beta-blockers, sotalol, and ICD's.

Authors:  A Capucci; D Aschieri; G Q Villani
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 5.  Modeling defibrillation of the heart: approaches and insights.

Authors:  Natalia Trayanova; Jason Constantino; Takashi Ashihara; Gernot Plank
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2011

6.  [Influence of amiodarone on defibrillation threshold and perioperative complications in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator with transvenous electrodes and biphasic shocks].

Authors:  W Grimm; V Menz; J Hoffmann; U Timmann; R Moosdorf; B Maisch
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  1997-06

7.  Experience with unipolar pectoral defibrillation.

Authors:  R K Reddy; G H Bardy
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  1997-03

Review 8.  Current state of knowledge and experts' perspective on the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

Authors:  Massimo Santini; Riccardo Cappato; Dietrich Andresen; Johannes Brachmann; D Wyn Davies; John Cleland; Alessandro Filippi; Edoardo Gronda; Richard Hauer; Gerhard Steinbeck; David Steinhaus
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 1.900

9.  Migration of an automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patch causing massive hemothorax.

Authors:  R L Quigley; M E Hamer; S Swiryn
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1996

10.  Randomized comparison of a 90 uF capacitor three-electrode defibrillation system with a 125 uF two-electrode defibrillation system.

Authors:  M Bahu; B P Knight; R Weiss; S J Hahn; R Goyal; E G Daoud; K C Man; F Morady; S A Strickberger
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.