Literature DB >> 846204

Timing control accuracy in normal speakers and stutterers.

M H Cooper, G D Allen.   

Abstract

This study attempted to assess the abilities of 10 normal speakers, five stutterers in therapy, and five stutterers no longer in therapy, to control the time program of repeated utterances. The speech sample comprised repeated sentences, paragraphs, and nursery rhymes, and a finger-tapping task was included as a control. Temporal accuracy was measured. Results suggest that (1) there is a wide range of timing abilities, even among the normal speakers, with considerable overlap between the different groups of speakers; (2) on most of the experimental tasks, normal speakers are more accurate timers than are stutterers; (3) stutterers released from therapy are more accurate timers than are stutterers still in therapy, whenever these groups differ; and (4) subjects' speech timing scores correlate moderately with their tapping scores. These results are discussed in terms of (1) theoretical timing control processes, such as a neural clock for controlling speech segment durations, and a speech motor output buffer, whose capacity may be limited in stutterers, and (2) known effects of rhythmic constraints and respiratory irregularity on fluency.

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 846204     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.2001.55

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  12 in total

1.  Motor practice effects and sensorimotor integration in adults who stutter: Evidence from visuomotor tracking performance.

Authors:  Victoria Tumanova; Patricia M Zebrowski; Shawn S Goodman; Richard M Arenas
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 2.538

2.  Evidence That Bimanual Motor Timing Performance Is Not a Significant Factor in Developmental Stuttering.

Authors:  Allison I Hilger; Howard Zelaznik; Anne Smith
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Adults who stutter and metronome synchronization: evidence for a nonspeech timing deficit.

Authors:  Anastasia G Sares; Mickael L D Deroche; Douglas M Shiller; Vincent L Gracco
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Evidence that a motor timing deficit is a factor in the development of stuttering.

Authors:  Lindsey Olander; Anne Smith; Howard N Zelaznik
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Evidence for a rhythm perception deficit in children who stutter.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Wieland; J Devin McAuley; Laura C Dilley; Soo-Eun Chang
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Adults Who Stutter Show Diminished Word Fluency, Regardless of Mode.

Authors:  Erica Lescht; Michael Walsh Dickey; Melissa D Stockbridge; Nan Bernstein Ratner
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 2.674

7.  Practice and retention of nonwords in adults who stutter.

Authors:  Jayanthi Sasisekaran; Sanford Weisberg
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.538

8.  Control and prediction components of movement planning in stuttering versus nonstuttering adults.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri; Roman A Prokopenko; J Randall Flanagan; Ludo Max
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Non-verbal sensorimotor timing deficits in children and adolescents who stutter.

Authors:  Simone Falk; Thilo Müller; Simone Dalla Bella
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-06

10.  Behavioral and multimodal neuroimaging evidence for a deficit in brain timing networks in stuttering: a hypothesis and theory.

Authors:  Andrew C Etchell; Blake W Johnson; Paul F Sowman
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.