Literature DB >> 8461478

Experiences of the first 493 unrelated marrow donors in the National Marrow Donor Program.

D F Stroncek1, P V Holland, G Bartch, T Bixby, R G Simmons, J H Antin, K C Anderson, R C Ash, B J Bolwell, J A Hansen.   

Abstract

More than 410,000 people participated in the National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) as of October 1, 1991, and more than 850 volunteers had donated marrow. While the incidence of serious morbidity as a result of bone marrow donation is rare, the incidence of lesser complications and the long-term consequences of marrow donation are not known. To determine the incidence of donor complications and measure the recovery time of volunteer, unrelated marrow donors, we analyzed the results of surveys of the first 493 persons who donated marrow through the NMDP. The marrows were collected at 42 centers. The median age of the donors was 37.9 years (range 19.1 to 55.6 years). The median volume of marrow collected was 1,050 mL (range 180 to 2,983 mL). Autologous red blood cells were transfused to 89.8% (439) of donors but only 0.6% (3) of donors received allogeneic blood. Acute complications related to the collection procedure occurred in 5.9% of donors; but a serious complication, apnea during anesthesia, occurred in only one donor. When donors were questioned approximately 2 days following discharge from their hospitalization, most donors described symptoms related to the collection; 74.8% experienced tiredness, 67.8% experienced pain at the marrow collection site, and 51.6% of the donors experienced low back pain. Donors were surveyed repeatedly until they felt that they had recovered completely. Mean recovery time was 15.8 days; however, 42 (10%) donors felt that it took them > or = 30 days to recover fully. The duration of the marrow collection procedure and duration of anesthesia both positively correlated with donor pain and/or fatigue following the collection; but the duration of the collection procedure had the highest correlation with post-collection pain and fatigue. The volume of marrow collected per unit of donor weight was more weakly correlated with donor pain and/or fatigue than the anesthesia and collection times. When multivariate analysis was used to analyze the correlation between donor recovery time and these variables, only the duration of the collection was found to correlate significantly with donor recovery time (P = .001). This analysis demonstrates that marrow donation is well tolerated with few complications. To decrease further the incidence of donor discomfort and recovery time following donation, the duration of the collection procedure, and probably the duration of anesthesia, and the volume of marrow collected, should be kept to a minimum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8461478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  10 in total

Review 1.  Stem cell bioprocessing: fundamentals and principles.

Authors:  Mark R Placzek; I-Ming Chung; Hugo M Macedo; Siti Ismail; Teresa Mortera Blanco; Mayasari Lim; Jae Min Cha; Iliana Fauzi; Yunyi Kang; David C L Yeo; Chi Yip Joan Ma; Julia M Polak; Nicki Panoskaltsis; Athanasios Mantalaris
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Protecting the Health and Safety of Cell and Tissue Donors.

Authors:  David F Stroncek; Lee England
Journal:  ISBT Sci Ser       Date:  2015-04-01

3.  Reliable assessment of bone marrow and bone marrow concentrates using automated hematology analyzer.

Authors:  Venkata P Mantripragada; Nicolas S Piuzzi; Jaiben George; Wesley Bova; Mitchell Ng; Cynthia Boehm; George F Muschler
Journal:  Regen Med       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 4.  A review of the haematopoietic stem cell donation experience: is there room for improvement?

Authors:  A Billen; J A Madrigal; B E Shaw
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 5.483

5.  Mathematical model of adult stem cell regeneration with cross-talk between genetic and epigenetic regulation.

Authors:  Jinzhi Lei; Simon A Levin; Qing Nie
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Unrelated adult stem cell donor medical suitability: recommendations from the World Marrow Donor Association Clinical Working Group Committee.

Authors:  R N Lown; J Philippe; W Navarro; S M van Walraven; L Philips-Johnson; M Fechter; R Pawson; M Bengtsson; M Beksac; S Field; H Yang; B E Shaw
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 5.483

7.  Lower risk for serious adverse events and no increased risk for cancer after PBSC vs BM donation.

Authors:  Michael A Pulsipher; Pintip Chitphakdithai; Brent R Logan; Willis H Navarro; John E Levine; John P Miller; Bronwen E Shaw; Paul V O'Donnell; Navneet S Majhail; Dennis L Confer
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Donation of peripheral blood stem cells to unrelated strangers: A thematic analysis.

Authors:  Annelies Billen; J Alejandro Madrigal; Katrina Scior; Bronwen E Shaw; Andre Strydom
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A Child as a Donor for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Bioethical Justification-A Case Study on Sickle Cell Disease.

Authors:  Andrea Z Pereira; Ricardo Hellman; Nelson Hamerschlak; Andrea Kondo; Polianna Mara Rodrigues de Souza; Wilson Leite Pedreira; Luiz Fernando Alves Lima Mantovani; Eduardo Juan Troster; Henrique Grunspun; Marco Aurélio Scarpinella Bueno
Journal:  Case Rep Hematol       Date:  2017-02-23

10.  Decreased Opioid Consumption in Bone Marrow Harvest Patients Using Quadratus Lumborum Blocks in a Standardized Protocol.

Authors:  Nicole C McCoy; Ellen L Hay; Deborah A Romeo; J Wesley Doty; Bethany J Wolf; Michelle P Hudspeth
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-04-26
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.