Literature DB >> 8460919

Activity of ampicillin-sulbactam and oxacillin in experimental endocarditis caused by beta-lactamase-hyperproducing Staphylococcus aureus.

A Pefanis1, C Thauvin-Eliopoulos, G M Eliopoulos, R C Moellering.   

Abstract

Using a rat model of aortic valve infective endocarditis, we previously found that oxacillin was equally effective against an oxacillin-susceptible strain of Staphylococcus aureus and a beta-lactamase-hyperproducing borderline oxacillin-susceptible strain of S. aureus; also, ampicillin-sulbactam was less effective than oxacillin against both isolates and at low doses was less effective against the borderline-susceptible strain than against the fully oxacillin-susceptible strain (C. Thauvin-Eliopoulos, L. B. Rice, G. M. Eliopoulos, and R. C. Moellering, Jr., Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34:728-732, 1990). In the present study, we extended this work, using alternative treatment schedules and additional bacterial strains. Extending treatment with low doses of ampicillin-sulbactam (500 and 250 mg/kg of body weight per day, respectively) to 6.5 days resulted in equalization of effectiveness against the previously studied strains BOSSA-1 and OSSA-1 (3.75 +/- 1.61 log10 and 4.71 +/- 1.79 log10 CFU of residual viable bacteria per g, respectively). Against the borderline oxacillin-susceptible strain BOSSA-1, increasing the sulbactam dosage from 500 to 2,000 mg/kg/day while maintaining a fixed dose of ampicillin (1,000 mg/kg/day) by continuous infusion resulted in lower bacterial counts (4.93 +/- 1.84 log10 versus 3.65 +/- 1.26 log10 CFU of residual viable bacteria per g, respectively), but this difference was of only borderline significance; differences in efficacy between the low-dose and high-dose sulbactam regimens were exaggerated when intermittent intravenous administration was used (6.19 +/- 1.90 log10 versus 3.37 +/- 1.41 log10 CFU/g, respectively; P < 0.001). However, for any individual sulbactam dosage, the model of administration (continuous versus intermittent infusion) did not affect the activity of the regimen. When additional strains were used in the model, oxacillin and ampicillin-sulbactam (1,000 plus 2,000 mg/kg/day) were equally effective against both oxacillin-susceptible and borderline oxacillin-resistant strains of S. aureus. These results support the predictions that oxacillin would be clinically effective in the treatment of infections caused by borderline oxacillin-susceptible strains of S. aureus and that, except at very low doses, ampicillin-sulbactam would also be as effective against borderline-susceptible strains as against fully oxacillin-susceptible strains of S. aureus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8460919      PMCID: PMC187700          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.37.3.507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  12 in total

1.  Comparative efficacy of amoxicillin-clavulanate, cloxacillin, and vancomycin against methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis in rats.

Authors:  L Cantoni; A Wenger; M P Glauser; J Bille
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 5.226

2.  Statistics in practice. Comparing the means of several groups.

Authors:  K Godfrey
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-12-05       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Beta-Lactam-beta-lactamase-inhibitor combinations are active in experimental endocarditis caused by beta-lactamase-producing oxacillin-resistant staphylococci.

Authors:  L Hirano; A S Bayer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  The role of beta-lactamase in staphylococcal resistance to penicillinase-resistant penicillins and cephalosporins.

Authors:  L K McDougal; C Thornsberry
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Detection of methicillin-resistant staphylococci by using the polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  S Unal; J Hoskins; J E Flokowitsch; C Y Wu; D A Preston; P L Skatrud
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Continuous-infusion ampicillin therapy of enterococcal endocarditis in rats.

Authors:  C Thauvin; G M Eliopoulos; S Willey; C Wennersten; R C Moellering
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Efficacy of oxacillin and ampicillin-sulbactam combination in experimental endocarditis caused by beta-lactamase-hyperproducing Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  C Thauvin-Eliopoulos; L B Rice; G M Eliopoulos; R C Moellering
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Low-level methicillin resistance in strains of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  H F Chambers; G Archer; M Matsuhashi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Borderline susceptibility to antistaphylococcal penicillins is not conferred exclusively by the hyperproduction of beta-lactamase.

Authors:  N Barg; H Chambers; D Kernodle
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Rat model of experimental endocarditis.

Authors:  J Santoro; M E Levison
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 3.441

View more
  3 in total

1.  Diversity of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated in a Canadian hospital.

Authors:  O Hammerberg; H Bialkowska-Hobrzanska; D Gregson; K McGhie; R Behme
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 2.  Clinical role of beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations.

Authors:  Nelson Lee; Kwok-Yung Yuen; Cyrus R Kumana
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Mechanistic Insights Into the Differential Efficacy of Daptomycin Plus β-Lactam Combinations Against Daptomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium.

Authors:  Razieh Kebriaei; Kyle C Stamper; Kavindra V Singh; Ayesha Khan; Seth A Rice; An Q Dinh; Truc T Tran; Barbara E Murray; Cesar A Arias; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 5.226

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.