Literature DB >> 8460888

Molecular control of cell fate in the neural crest: the sympathoadrenal lineage.

D J Anderson1.   

Abstract

Over the past five years, new insights have been gained into the biology of the SA lineage. These advances have been powered by the development of immunologic methods to isolate embryonic SA progenitors from fetal adrenal glands and sympathetic ganglia. Analysis of these embryonic progenitors has confirmed many of the ideas derived from earlier studies of postnatal cells, but has necessitated several revisions in our thinking, as well. First, embryonic SA progenitors appear to be distinct from mature SIF cells, a cell type initially postulated to be the central intermediate in the SA lineage. Second, FGF, not NGF, appears to be an important early influence on neuronal fate; NGF responsiveness appears relatively late in differentiation. Third, the development of both sympathetic neurons and adrenal chromaffin cells is not a one-step process, but rather involves a series of events, in which the cells change their responsiveness to growth factors and glucocorticoids. Fourth, emerging circumstantial evidence suggests that SA progenitors may have additional developmental potentials. Finally, new insights have been gained into the molecular mechanisms that underlie both the differentiation of SA progenitors and their determination from earlier multipotent neural crest cells. These advances have made the SA progenitor a well-defined system for studying the molecular control of cell fate in a vertebrate neurogenic precursor cell. The analysis of the SA lineage at the cell biological level has raised several interesting molecular questions for future investigation. In the neuronal branch of the SA lineage, how is the acquisition of NGF-responsiveness and NGF-dependence controlled, and what is the relationship of these events to the expression of p140trk and p75? In the chromaffin branch of the pathway, which molecules control the timing of PNMT expression? In the uncommitted SA progenitor, what is the molecular basis of the antagonism between the competing neuronal and chromaffin pathways of differentiation, and how does commitment to neuronal differentiation occur? Can SA progenitors differentiate to enteric neurons in vitro, and which differentiation and survival factors control this phenotype, as well as the other classical neurotransmitter and neuropeptide phenotypes expressed by SA derivatives? What are the roles of MASH1 and other regulatory genes in controlling early stages in neural crest cell determination, and how is the expression of these molecules in turn controlled? How much of the genetic regulatory network controlling neuronal differentiation in Drosophila has been conserved in vertebrates?(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8460888     DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ne.16.030193.001021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci        ISSN: 0147-006X            Impact factor:   12.449


  45 in total

1.  Enhancement of the dense-core vesicle secretory cycle by glucocorticoid differentiation of PC12 cells: characteristics of rapid exocytosis and endocytosis.

Authors:  A Elhamdani; M E Brown; C R Artalejo; H C Palfrey
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Novel aspects of orbital fibroblast pathology.

Authors:  T J Smith
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.256

3.  Transcription factor AP-2β regulates the neurotransmitter phenotype and maturation of chromaffin cells.

Authors:  Seok Jong Hong; Yang Hoon Huh; Amanda Leung; Hyun Jin Choi; Yunmin Ding; Un Jung Kang; Seung Hyun Yoo; Reinhard Buettner; Kwang-Soo Kim
Journal:  Mol Cell Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 4.314

Review 4.  Review: the role of neural crest cells in the endocrine system.

Authors:  Meghan Sara Adams; Marianne Bronner-Fraser
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.943

5.  miR-124-regulated RhoG reduces neuronal process complexity via ELMO/Dock180/Rac1 and Cdc42 signalling.

Authors:  Kristin Franke; Wolfgang Otto; Sascha Johannes; Jan Baumgart; Robert Nitsch; Stefan Schumacher
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 6.  Peripheral chemoreceptors: function and plasticity of the carotid body.

Authors:  Prem Kumar; Nanduri R Prabhakar
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 9.090

7.  Mice deficient in the orphan receptor steroidogenic factor 1 lack adrenal glands and gonads but express P450 side-chain-cleavage enzyme in the placenta and have normal embryonic serum levels of corticosteroids.

Authors:  Y Sadovsky; P A Crawford; K G Woodson; J A Polish; M A Clements; L M Tourtellotte; K Simburger; J Milbrandt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Revisiting the stimulus-secretion coupling in the adrenal medulla: role of gap junction-mediated intercellular communication.

Authors:  Claude Colomer; Michel G Desarménien; Nathalie C Guérineau
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2009-05-16       Impact factor: 5.590

9.  Distinct pharmacological properties and distribution in neurons and endocrine cells of two isoforms of the human vesicular monoamine transporter.

Authors:  J D Erickson; M K Schafer; T I Bonner; L E Eiden; E Weihe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Prostaglandin E2 elicits a morphological change in cultured orbital fibroblasts from patients with Graves ophthalmopathy.

Authors:  T J Smith; H S Wang; M G Hogg; R C Henrikson; C R Keese; I Giaever
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-05-24       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.