Literature DB >> 8459033

Comparison of flow and static image cytometry in the determination of ploidy.

D Lanigan1, P A McLean, B Curran, M Leader.   

Abstract

AIMS: To compare the efficiency of flow cytometry and computed image cytometry; and to see if a reliable set of guidelines regarding interpretation of histograms could be drawn up.
METHODS: The two methods were applied to a series of 111 formalin fixed renal cell carcinomas. Data generated by both methods were compared.
RESULTS: The methods agreed in 85 cases. Hypodiploidy was detected by computed image cytometry in seven cases in which flow cytometry had shown only an aneuploid peak. Aneuploidy in seven in which the corresponding flow cytometry histogram was diploid. There was an overlap in the second peak proportions on flow cytometry histograms between those classed as diploid or tetraploid by computed image cytometry. In six cases the flow cytometry histograms had unacceptably high coefficients of variation and in all of these cases computed image cytometry demonstrated aneuploidy.
CONCLUSIONS: Computed image cytometry is particularly useful for clarifying difficult areas in flow histograms--specifically, high coefficients of variation, high G2M phase, as well as possible near diploid aneuploidy and hypodiploidy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8459033      PMCID: PMC501144          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.46.2.135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  22 in total

1.  DNA ploidy in breast lesions. A comparative study using two commercial image analysis systems and flow cytometry.

Authors:  D C Wilbur; M F Zakowski; C M Kosciol; D F Sojda; W T Pastuszak
Journal:  Anal Quant Cytol Histol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 0.302

2.  A prospective comparison of DNA quantitation by image and flow cytometry.

Authors:  T W Bauer; R R Tubbs; M G Edinger; P F Suit; G N Gephardt; H S Levin
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  Image analysis confirmation of DNA aneuploidy in flow cytometric DNA distributions having a wide coefficient of variation of the G0/G1 peak.

Authors:  P W McFadden; L J Clowry; K Daehnert; L L Hause; S M Koethe
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  DNA quantification in colorectal carcinoma using flow and image analysis cytometry.

Authors:  R E Fausel; W Burleigh; D B Kaminsky
Journal:  Anal Quant Cytol Histol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 0.302

5.  The relationship of deoxyribonucleic acid content to conventional prognostic factors in Wilms tumor.

Authors:  L J Layfield; A W Ritchie; R Ehrlich
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Synchronous and metachronous bilateral testicular tumors. Mayo Clinic experience.

Authors:  S R Patel; R L Richardson; L Kvols
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Flow cytometric assessment of deoxyribonucleic acid content in renal adenocarcinoma: does ploidy status enhance prognostic stratification over stage alone?

Authors:  S M Currin; S E Lee; P J Walther
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Discrepancies between flow cytometric and cytogenetic studies in the detection of aneuploidy in human solid tumors.

Authors:  S E Shackney; D R Burholt; A A Pollice; C A Smith; R P Pugh; R J Hartsock
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1990

9.  Comparative assessment of proliferation and DNA content in breast carcinoma by image analysis and flow cytometry.

Authors:  A E Dawson; J A Norton; D S Weinberg
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.307

10.  Prognostic significance of the DNA content of renal carcinoma.

Authors:  J B deKernion; E Mukamel; A W Ritchie; B Blyth; J Hannah; R Bohman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1989-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  6 in total

1.  Image analysis derived ploidy and proliferation indices in soft tissue sarcomas: comparison with clinical outcome.

Authors:  B A Michie; C Black; R P Reid; A Barrett; D L Hamblen
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Combining aneuploidy and dysplasia for colitis' cancer risk assessment outperforms current surveillance efficiency: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rüdiger Meyer; Sandra Freitag-Wolf; Silke Blindow; Jürgen Büning; Jens K Habermann
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  DNA content heterogeneity in neuroblastoma analyzed by means of image cytometry and its potential significance.

Authors:  Zsombor Melegh; Erzsébet Csernák; Erika Tóth; Zsuzsa Veleczki; Edina Magyarosy; Kálmán Nagy; Zoltán Szentirmay
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2005-04-13       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Prospective evaluation of advanced molecular markers and imaging techniques in patients with indeterminate bile duct strictures.

Authors:  Michael J Levy; Todd H Baron; Amy C Clayton; Felicity B Enders; Christopher J Gostout; Kevin C Halling; Benjamin R Kipp; Bret T Petersen; Lewis R Roberts; Ashwin Rumalla; Thomas J Sebo; Mark D Topazian; Maurits J Wiersema; Gregory J Gores
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  A non-diploid DNA status is linked to poor prognosis in renal cell cancer.

Authors:  Franziska Büscheck; Christoph Fraune; Martina Kluth; Maximilian Lennartz; Ronald Simon; Claudia Hube-Magg; Christian Morlock; Silvano Barbieri; Carolin Wahl; Christian Eichelberg; Christina Möller-Koop; Doris Höflmayer; Corinna Wittmer; Waldemar Wilczak; Guido Sauter; Margit Fisch; Till Eichenauer; Michael Rink
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-05-02       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Heterogeneity of DNA ploidy pattern in carcinoma of the gallbladder: primary and metastatic sites.

Authors:  N Futakawa; W Kimura; H Ando; T Muto; Y Esaki
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1997-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.