Literature DB >> 8458784

Regional diaphragmatic length and EMG activity during inspiratory pressure support and CPAP in awake sheep.

A Torres1, R M Kacmarek, W R Kimball, J Qvist, K Stanek, R Whyte, W M Zapol.   

Abstract

We examined diaphragmatic mechanics in awake sheep during quiet breathing (QB) and the randomized application of 5, 10, and 15 cmH2O continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), inspiratory pressure support (IPS), and equal combinations of IPS and CPAP (IPS/CPAP). We measured esophageal, gastric, and transdiaphragmatic (Pdi) pressures and regional length, shortening, and electromyogram (EMG) activity of both costal and crural diaphragmatic segments. Segmental resting length normalized to QB decreased during 15 cmH2O CPAP (costal, 19.2 +/- 3.3%; crural, 7.5 +/- 2.1%; P < 0.05) and during 15/15 cmH2O IPS/CPAP (costal 25.3 +/- 4.8%, crural 9.9 +/- 2.6%; P < 0.05). Only during 15 cmH2O IPS did costal shortening fraction increase (67% QB; P < 0.05). Compared with QB, during 15 cmH2O CPAP, end-tidal CO2 increased 6 Torr, regional EMG activity increased threefold, and Pdi increased 58%. During 15 cmH2O IPS these values decreased 3 Torr, threefold, and 44% respectively, but during IPS/CPAP they remained unchanged. Expiratory gastric pressure (Exp-Pga) reached 4.3 +/- 0.4 cmH2O at 15 cmH2O CPAP, but during IPS/CPAP Exp-Pga was less (maximum of 1.7 +/- 0.4 cmH2O) than at comparable CPAP (P < 0.05), despite the shorter diaphragmatic length. We conclude that: 1) IPS alters the actions of the diaphragm during CPAP, 2) Exp-Pga is poorly coupled to diaphragmatic end-expiratory length, and 3) both IPS and the release of Exp-Pga assist active diaphragmatic shortening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8458784     DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1993.74.2.695

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  4 in total

1.  Inspiratory pressure support: does it make a clinical difference?

Authors:  R M Kacmarek
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Consensus conference on mechanical ventilation--January 28-30, 1993 at Northbrook, Illinois, USA. Part 2.

Authors:  A S Slutsky
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Myths and Misconceptions of Airway Pressure Release Ventilation: Getting Past the Noise and on to the Signal.

Authors:  Penny Andrews; Joseph Shiber; Maria Madden; Gary F Nieman; Luigi Camporota; Nader M Habashi
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  The Effects of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure on Transpulmonary Pressure and Recruitment-Derecruitment During Neurally Adjusted Ventilator Assist: A Continuous Computed Tomography Study in an Animal Model of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Authors:  Carl Hannes Widing; Mariangela Pellegrini; Anders Larsson; Gaetano Perchiazzi
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 4.566

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.