Literature DB >> 8458756

Optimal modulation frequency for amplitude-modulation following response in young children during sleep.

M Aoyagi1, T Kiren, Y Kim, Y Suzuki, T Fuse, Y Koike.   

Abstract

In young children, there appears to be no advantage to recording steady-state response (SSR) at a stimulus rate of 40 Hz. To determine the optimal modulation frequency in auditory SSR evoked by sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (SAM) tones (amplitude-modulation following response: AMFR) in children during sleep and compare response patterns of AMFR at different modulation frequencies while awake with those during sleep, AMFR was examined in 10 adults with normal hearing while awake and during sleep and in 10 young children with normal hearing during sleep. The stimulus was a 1000 Hz, 50 dBnHL SAM tone with a modulation depth of 95%. Modulation frequency was varied from 20 to 200 Hz in 20 Hz steps. Response was determined by phase spectral analysis and the S/N ratio calculated by spectral amplitude at the modulation frequency and noise level around the modulation frequency using fast Fourier transform. Although AMFR was clearly evoked only by a modulation frequency of 40 Hz in adults while awake, AMFRs at modulation frequencies of 80 and 100 Hz were detected during sleep, in addition to 40 Hz AMFR. In children, 40 Hz AMFR was difficult to detect, but response could be clearly detected at higher modulation rates, especially at modulation frequencies of 80 and 100 Hz, compared with response in adults during sleep. Modulation frequencies from 80 to 100 Hz would thus appear optimal for detecting AMFR during sleep in children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8458756     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(93)90218-p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  5 in total

1.  Frequency characteristics of contralateral sound suppression of 40-Hz auditory steady-state response.

Authors:  Hiromichi Kiyokawa; Tetsuaki Kawase; Hidetoshi Oshima; Atsuko Maki; Toshimitsu Kobayashi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  [Steady-state responses of the auditory system: a comparison of different methods].

Authors:  S Liebler; S Hoth; P K Plinkert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Auditory steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli in children with functional or sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Shin Kariya; Kunihiro Fukushima; Akihiro Kawasaki; Yuko Kataoka; Kazunori Nishizaki
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Clinical comparison of the auditory steady-state response with the click auditory brainstem response in infants.

Authors:  Hyo Sook Lee; Joong Ho Ahn; Jong Woo Chung; Tae Hyun Yoon; Kwang-Sun Lee
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-12-26       Impact factor: 3.372

5.  Effects of contralateral noise on the 20-Hz auditory steady state response--magnetoencephalography study.

Authors:  Hajime Usubuchi; Tetsuaki Kawase; Akitake Kanno; Izumi Yahata; Hiromitsu Miyazaki; Nobukazu Nakasato; Ryuta Kawashima; Yukio Katori
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.