Literature DB >> 8458561

The effect of the APACHE II score and selected clinical variables on survival following cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

M H Ebell1, P S Preston.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this analysis is to determine the effect of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score and other clinical variables on survival following cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and to identify patient subpopulations with extremely poor survival.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on 218 consecutive adult inpatients undergoing CPR on the general wards and in the intensive care units of a community hospital between January 1, 1989, and July 1, 1991. The patient's age, sex, prior residence, reason for admission, discharge diagnoses, discharge disposition, APACHE II score, and cardiac ejection fraction by echocardiography were recorded.
RESULTS: The age, sex, and reason for admission were not significant predictors of survival following CPR. Multiple variable analysis revealed that an increasing APACHE II score (P = .05), a serum creatinine greater than 311 mumol per L (3.5 mg per dL, P = .02), and metastatic cancer (P = .04) were each related to a decreased rate of survival to discharge following CPR. Patient subpopulations with a 0% rate of survival to discharge included those with metastatic cancer (n = 26, P = .02), a serum creatinine greater than 311 mumol per L (3.5 mg per dL) on admission (n = 22, P = .03), and a diagnosis of cardiovascular disease with an APACHE II score greater than 15 on admission (n = 18, P = .007).
CONCLUSIONS: The APACHE II score is a useful predictor of failure to survive to discharge following CPR. Several groups of patients were identified with negligible rates of survival to discharge. Physicians should use such prediagnostic information to provide patients with informed consent when discussing do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders. We suggest that physicians make a special effort to address the DNR status of patients falling to one of the negligible-survival groups identified by this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8458561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Med        ISSN: 0742-3225            Impact factor:   1.756


  6 in total

1.  Do not resuscitate decisions. Rigid discussion process before making these decisions may cause distress.

Authors:  T Downes; J Liddle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-01-13

2.  Survival after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  M H Ebell; L A Becker; H C Barry; M Hagen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  In-hospital cardiac arrest: incidence, prognosis and possible measures to improve survival.

Authors:  Claudio Sandroni; Jerry Nolan; Fabio Cavallaro; Massimo Antonelli
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  The status of the do-not-resuscitate order in Chinese clinical trial patients in a cancer centre.

Authors:  J M Liu; W C Lin; Y M Chen; H W Wu; N S Yao; L T Chen; J Whang-Peng
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  APACHE II scores as predictors of cardio pulmonary resuscitation outcome: Evidence from a tertiary care institute in a low-income country.

Authors:  Muhammad Junaid Patel; Nadeem Ullah Khan; Muhammad Furqan; Safia Awan; Muhammad Shoaib Khan; Waqar Kashif; Ayesha L Sorathia; Syed Ather Hussain; Mohammed Umer Mir
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2012-01

6.  Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Hematologic Malignancy Patients After Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Experience of a Large Oncology Center.

Authors:  Mary Lou Warren; Virginia V Schneider; Yun Qing; Lei Feng; Jeanne Y Campbell; Jason W Myers; Marian Von-Maszewski; Cristina Gutierrez
Journal:  J Adv Pract Oncol       Date:  2021-09-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.