Literature DB >> 8458040

In vitro activity of clarithromycin, cefprozil, and other common oral antimicrobial agents against gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens.

D J Ritchie1, A W Hopefl, T W Milligan, J E Byrne, M S Maddux.   

Abstract

Macrolide and beta-lactam antimicrobial agents are frequently used for the treatment of upper and lower respiratory tract infections and skin or skin structure infections. To evaluate the relative in vitro activity of these antimicrobial drugs against organisms commonly involved in these infections, we tested clarithromycin, erythromycin, cefprozil, cefuroxime, cefaclor, cephalexin, amoxicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanate, and doxycycline against 174 gram-positive and gram-negative clinical isolates, including Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, group A beta-hemolytic streptococci, alpha-hemolytic streptococci, Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Manual broth microdilution susceptibility testing was used with a standard inoculum of 5 x 10(4) colony-forming units/well at pH of 7.2. Clarithromycin was the most active agent against streptococci. Methicillin-susceptible S aureus exhibited resistance to both clarithromycin and erythromycin, but was susceptible to cefprozil, cefuroxime, amoxicillin/clavulanate, and doxycycline. Cefprozil was at least as active as cefuroxime, cefaclor, and cephalexin against all organisms tested, but was fourfold less active than doxycycline against E coli and 16-fold less active than clarithromycin versus S pneumoniae. The gram-negative isolates tested showed resistance to clarithromycin and erythromycin; however, cefprozil was as active as amoxicillin/clavulanate against K pneumoniae and E coli. These results demonstrate that clarithromycin provides superior in vitro activity against common streptococci, while cefprozil, cefuroxime, amoxicillin/clavulanate, and doxycycline provide greater activity against methicillin-susceptible S aureus, K pneumoniae, and E coli. Prospective clinical trials are needed to determine the clinical significance of these findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8458040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  7 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics of a clarithromycin suspension administered via nasogastric tube to seriously ill patients.

Authors:  D N Fish; E Abraham
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Clarithromycin. A review of its efficacy in the treatment of respiratory tract infections in immunocompetent patients.

Authors:  H D Langtry; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Dynamics of clarithromycin and azithromycin efficacies against experimental Haemophilus influenzae pulmonary infection.

Authors:  J D Alder; P J Ewing; A M Nilius; M Mitten; A Tovcimak; A Oleksijew; K Jarvis; L Paige; S K Tanaka
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Staphylococcal skin infections in children: rational drug therapy recommendations.

Authors:  Shamez Ladhani; Mehdi Garbash
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.022

5.  Single-dose intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics of azithromycin, clarithromycin, ciprofloxacin, and cefuroxime in volunteer subjects.

Authors:  J E Conte; J Golden; S Duncan; E McKenna; E Lin; E Zurlinden
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics of clarithromycin and of erythromycin.

Authors:  J E Conte; J A Golden; S Duncan; E McKenna; E Zurlinden
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Human Bioequivalence Study of Clarithromycin from Two Tablet Formulations after Single Oral Administration.

Authors:  I Niopas; A C Daftsios; N Nikolaidis
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.859

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.