Literature DB >> 8457691

Indications for cholecystectomy: the results of a consensus panel approach.

G M Fraser1, D Pilpel, S Hollis, J Kosecoff, R H Brook.   

Abstract

A consensus panel approach was used in Israel to develop a list of clinical indications for which there was agreement that cholecystectomy should be performed. Nine physicians from different disciplines were asked to score a list of 266 clinical indications for cholecystectomy. Each indication was scored on a scale of 1 (inappropriate, i.e. health risks exceed health benefits) to 9 (appropriate, i.e. benefits exceed risks). Each indication also included one of four comorbidity levels (none to high). Agreement and disagreement were defined and panelists met to discuss, modify and rescore the list. The composition of the panel and definitions of agreement had a considerable impact on the preparation of a list of agreed, appropriate indications for cholecystectomy. Gastroenterologists in the panel were less likely to recommend surgery than either surgeons or general internists both before and after the panel discussion. Following the discussion the level of agreement (defined as after discarding the highest and lowest score all of the remaining seven panelists were in a 3-point range) increased from 39% to 46% (p < 0.08) and disagreement decreased from 27% to 18% (p < 0.01). Fifty-nine of the 266 indications were considered appropriate with agreement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8457691     DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/5.1.75

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Assur Health Care        ISSN: 1040-6166


  5 in total

1.  Consensus conferences must include a systematic search and categorization of the evidence.

Authors:  S Sauerland; E Neugebauer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Development of explicit criteria for cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J M Quintana; J Cabriada; I López de Tejada; M Varona; V Oribe; B Barrios; I Aróstegui; A Bilbao
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-12

3.  The emergence of clinical practice parameter guidelines in neuro-oncology: promise of utility tempered with caution.

Authors:  Mark E Linskey
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Health-related quality of life and appropriateness of cholecystectomy.

Authors:  José Ma Quintana; Jose Cabriada; Inmaculada Aróstegui; Victor Oribe; Luis Perdigo; Mercedes Varona; Amaia Bilbao
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Evidence-linked, clinical practice guidelines-getting serious; getting professional.

Authors:  Mark E Linskey; Steven N Kalkanis
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.130

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.