M Shuster1, J L Keller. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Chedoke-McMaster Hospitals, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of fire department first-responder defibrillation on time to defibrillation in a mid-sized community with two tiers of emergency medical services (EMS) ambulance response. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: The study area was the region of Hamilton-Wentworth, which has more than 445,000 inhabitants and covers 1,136 km2 (438 square miles). TYPE OF PARTICIPANTS: We studied 297 victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest presenting to the EMS system between May 1, 1990, and April 30, 1991. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The mean defibrillation interval was decreased from 11.96 minutes to 8.50 minutes (P < .001) by the introduction of fire first-responder defibrillation. Survival was significantly greater with bystander-witnessed arrest, initial rhythm of ventricular fibrillation, and presence of a pulse on arrival in the emergency department. CONCLUSION: In our EMS system, fire first-responders were able to provide defibrillation in significantly shorter times than ambulance attendants. Other EMS systems should review their response times and consider instituting first-responder defibrillation as one means of reducing defibrillation intervals.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of fire department first-responder defibrillation on time to defibrillation in a mid-sized community with two tiers of emergency medical services (EMS) ambulance response. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: The study area was the region of Hamilton-Wentworth, which has more than 445,000 inhabitants and covers 1,136 km2 (438 square miles). TYPE OF PARTICIPANTS: We studied 297 victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest presenting to the EMS system between May 1, 1990, and April 30, 1991. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The mean defibrillation interval was decreased from 11.96 minutes to 8.50 minutes (P < .001) by the introduction of fire first-responder defibrillation. Survival was significantly greater with bystander-witnessed arrest, initial rhythm of ventricular fibrillation, and presence of a pulse on arrival in the emergency department. CONCLUSION: In our EMS system, fire first-responders were able to provide defibrillation in significantly shorter times than ambulance attendants. Other EMS systems should review their response times and consider instituting first-responder defibrillation as one means of reducing defibrillation intervals.
Authors: Jasmeet Soar; Mary E Mancini; Farhan Bhanji; John E Billi; Jennifer Dennett; Judith Finn; Matthew Huei-Ming Ma; Gavin D Perkins; David L Rodgers; Mary Fran Hazinski; Ian Jacobs; Peter T Morley Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Iris Oving; Siobhan Masterson; Ingvild B M Tjelmeland; Martin Jonsson; Federico Semeraro; Mattias Ringh; Anatolij Truhlar; Diana Cimpoesu; Fredrik Folke; Stefanie G Beesems; Rudolph W Koster; Hanno L Tan; Marieke T Blom Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2019-12-16 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: E Kyriacou; S Pavlopoulos; A Berler; M Neophytou; A Bourka; A Georgoulas; A Anagnostaki; D Karayiannis; C Schizas; C Pattichis; A Andreou; D Koutsouris Journal: Biomed Eng Online Date: 2003-03-24 Impact factor: 2.819
Authors: Iris Oving; Corina de Graaf; Siobhan Masterson; Rudolph W Koster; Aeilko H Zwinderman; Remy Stieglis; Hajriz AliHodzic; Enrico Baldi; Susanne Betz; Diana Cimpoesu; Fredrik Folke; Dennis Rupp; Federico Semeraro; Anatolij Truhlar; Hanno L Tan; Marieke T Blom Journal: Lancet Reg Health Eur Date: 2020-11-20