Literature DB >> 8456999

Limitations of methods of osmometry: measuring the osmolality of biological fluids.

T E Sweeney, C A Beuchat.   

Abstract

Osmometry is an important tool in the investigation of biological phenomena, and commercially available instruments for freezing point and vapor pressure osmometry can determine the osmolality of solutions quickly and inexpensively. However, accurate measurements of osmolality using these techniques require that the solutions have specific characteristics, and that measurements do not exceed the limitations inherent to each method or instrument. The thermodynamic principles underlying osmometry constrain the range and accuracy of each measurement method, and these must be considered in establishing the usefulness of each technique. This paper addresses the principles and limitations of routine osmometry techniques. We begin by discussing definitions of osmolality and the thermodynamic concepts of solute-solvent systems that are central to understanding osmometry of biological (i.e., aqueous) solutions. We then explore the application of various methods of measuring osmolality, the nature of errors introduced by overextension or misapplication of osmometry techniques, and the interpretation of data in the literature acquired by various methods and protocols.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8456999     DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.1993.264.3.R469

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol        ISSN: 0002-9513


  20 in total

Review 1.  Osmosensing by bacteria: signals and membrane-based sensors.

Authors:  J M Wood
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 11.056

2.  Maturation of sperm volume regulation in the rat epididymis.

Authors:  Oliver S Damm; Trevor G Cooper
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 3.285

3.  Presence of supercooling-facilitating (anti-ice nucleation) hydrolyzable tannins in deep supercooling xylem parenchyma cells in Cercidiphyllum japonicum.

Authors:  Donghui Wang; Jun Kasuga; Chikako Kuwabara; Keita Endoh; Yukiharu Fukushi; Seizo Fujikawa; Keita Arakawa
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 4.116

4.  A comparison of whole blood and plasma osmolality and osmolarity.

Authors:  Samuel N Cheuvront; Robert W Kenefick; Kristen R Heavens; Marissa G Spitz
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 2.352

Review 5.  Body fluid dynamics: back to the future.

Authors:  Gautam Bhave; Eric G Neilson
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 10.121

6.  Creosote bush (Larrea tridentata) resin increases water demands and reduces energy availability in desert woodrats (Neotoma lepida).

Authors:  Antonio M Mangione; M Denise Dearing; William H Karasov
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Physiological response of Lactobacillus plantarum to salt and nonelectrolyte stress.

Authors:  E Glaasker; F S Tjan; P F Ter Steeg; W N Konings; B Poolman
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor by hydrogels in artificial tears.

Authors:  Jennifer S Lozano; Edward Y Chay; Jeffrey Healey; Rebecca Sullenberger; Jes K Klarlund
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2007-12-23       Impact factor: 3.467

9.  Validation of Surrogates of Urine Osmolality in Population Studies.

Authors:  Sonia Youhanna; Lise Bankir; Paul Jungers; David Porteous; Ozren Polasek; Murielle Bochud; Caroline Hayward; Olivier Devuyst
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.754

10.  Urine osmolality predicts calcium-oxalate crystallization risk in patients with recurrent urolithiasis.

Authors:  Stavros A Kavouras; Hyun-Gyu Suh; Marion Vallet; Michel Daudon; Andy Mauromoustakos; Mariacristina Vecchio; Ivan Tack
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.436

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.