Literature DB >> 8456759

A multicenter comparative trial of lovastatin and pravastatin in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. The Lovastatin Pravastatin Study Group.

.   

Abstract

A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial in 672 hypercholesterolemic patients evaluated the efficacy and safety profile of lovastatin and pravastatin across their usually recommended dosage ranges (lovastatin 20 to 80 mg/day and pravastatin 10 to 40 mg/day). After a 7-week placebo and diet run-in period, patients with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol > 160 mg/dl (4.1 mmol/liter) were randomized to 20 mg/day of lovastatin, or 10 mg/day of pravastatin for 6 weeks. The doses were then increased to 40 and 80 mg/day of lovastatin, and 20 and 40 mg/day of pravastatin at weeks 6 and 12, respectively. Efficacy and safety evaluations were performed at weeks 6, 12 and 18. The mean percent changes from baseline in LDL cholesterol at weeks 6, 12 and 18 were -28, -33 and -39%, respectively, with lovastatin, and -19, -25 and -27%, respectively, with pravastatin. All changes were significantly different from 0 (p < 0.001), and the between-group differences were highly significant (p < 0.001). The frequency of adverse events leading to discontinuation was low (2.9% with lovastatin, and 2.4% with pravastatin), with no significant differences between groups. Across the recommended dosage ranges, lovastatin was more effective than pravastatin in reducing total and LDL cholesterol; however, both agents had similar safety profiles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8456759     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)90829-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  7 in total

Review 1.  Benefits and risks of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in the prevention of coronary heart disease: a reappraisal.

Authors:  T R Pedersen; J A Tobert
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  Clinical positioning of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in lipid management protocols.

Authors:  M Cziraky
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Pravastatin. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and clinical effectiveness in the management of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  M Haria; D McTavish
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Neuropsychiatric adverse events associated with statins: epidemiology, pathophysiology, prevention and management.

Authors:  Marco Tuccori; Sabrina Montagnani; Stefania Mantarro; Alice Capogrosso-Sansone; Elisa Ruggiero; Alessandra Saporiti; Luca Antonioli; Matteo Fornai; Corrado Blandizzi
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.749

5.  Treatment of patients with familial defective apolipoprotein B-100 with pravastatin and gemfibrozil: a two-period cross-over study.

Authors:  P S Hansen; H Meinertz; L U Gerdes; I C Klausen; O Faergeman
Journal:  Clin Investig       Date:  1994-12

6.  Carotid plaque regression following 6-month statin therapy assessed by 3T cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison with ultrasound intima media thickness.

Authors:  Raymond Q Migrino; Mark Bowers; Leanne Harmann; Robert Prost; John F LaDisa
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 7.  Effects of statins on high-density lipoproteins: a potential contribution to cardiovascular benefit.

Authors:  Fergus McTaggart; Peter Jones
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 3.727

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.