Literature DB >> 8456473

Acute liver allograft rejection--is treatment always necessary?

B Dousset1, S G Hubscher, R T Padbury, B K Gunson, J A Buckels, A D Mayer, E Elias, P McMaster, J M Neuberger.   

Abstract

A group of 195 consecutive adult patients who received a primary orthotopic liver allograft were reviewed retrospectively to analyze the incidence of rejection, the response to antirejection therapy, and the impact of acute rejection on the development of ductopenic rejection. The diagnosis of acute rejection (AR) was based on a combination of clinical and histological criteria, and 69.7% of the patients had at least one episode of acute rejection. Only 6.7% of the patients failed to respond to steroids and were treated with OKT3. Four (2.3%) patients developed acute vanishing bile duct syndrome (within 60 days) and 6 (3.5%) patients developed chronic rejection. Eight patients who spontaneously recovered from AR without additional immunosuppression are described in detail. In addition to histological damage, all developed significant hepatic dysfunction. Except for one patient who died from disseminated fungal infection, the 7 remaining patients are alive with excellent graft function 7 to 21 months posttransplant. While severe AR and recurrent AR should be treated without delay, some patients with mild-to-moderate rejection and hepatic dysfunction may resolve without additional immunosuppression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8456473     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199303000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  4 in total

Review 1.  Liver transplantation in the UK.

Authors:  S R Bramhall; E Minford; B Gunson; J A Buckels
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Distinct response of liver myeloid dendritic cells to endotoxin is mediated by IL-27.

Authors:  Yun Chen; Guoping Jiang; Horng-Ren Yang; Xiaodong Gu; Lianfu Wang; Ching-Chuan Hsieh; Hong-Shiue Chou; John J Fung; Shiguang Qian; Lina Lu
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 25.083

Review 3.  [Progress in immunosuppression].

Authors:  C P Strassburg; M J Bahr; T Becker; J Klempnauer; M P Manns
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 4.  Long-term management of immunosuppression after pediatric liver transplantation: is minimization or withdrawal desirable or possible or both?

Authors:  Sandy Feng
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.640

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.