Literature DB >> 8454549

Influence of processing on the comparative feeding value of barley for feedlot cattle.

R A Zinn1.   

Abstract

Ninety-six crossbred steers were used in a 172-d feedlot growth performance trial to determine the effects of type processing on the comparative feeding value of barley in a 90% concentrate finishing diet. Treatments were: 1) steam-flaked corn (SFC; density = .31 kg/L); 2) dry-rolled barley (DRB; density = .39 kg/L); 3) steam-rolled barley, coarse roll (SRB-C, density = .39 kg/L); and 4) SRB, thin roll (SRB-T, density = .19 kg/L). The ADG was similar (P > .10) across barley treatments, averaging 1.29 kg/d. Feed intake (P < .05) was lower for SRB than for DRB. Diet NE was greater (P < .05) for SRB than for DRB. Feed intake was lower (P < .05) for SFC than for barley diets. The influence of grain processing on characteristics of digestion was evaluated using four Holstein steers (average BW = 230 kg) with cannulas in the rumen and proximal duodenum. Ruminal and total tract digestibility of OM and starch were lower (P < .05) for DRB than for SRB. Ruminal and total tract digestibility of OM and starch were similar (P > .10) for SRB-C and SRB-T. However, passage of nonammonia N was markedly increased (26.9%, P < .01) with SRB-T compared with SRB-C. This increase in ruminal N efficiency was due partly to reduced ruminal degradation of feed N (23.4%, P < .01) and partly to increased microbial N synthesis (13.3%, P > .10). The comparative feeding value of DRB, SRB-C, and SRB-T in this study was 90, 92, and 96% the value of SFC, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8454549     DOI: 10.2527/1993.7113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  5 in total

1.  Processing Index of Barley Grain and Dietary Undigested Neutral Detergent Fiber Concentration Affected Chewing Behavior, Ruminal pH and Total Tract Nutrient Digestibility of Heifers Fed a High Grain Diet.

Authors:  Tao Ran; Atef M Saleem; Karen A Beauchemin; Gregory B Penner; Wenzhu Yang
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Processing index of barley grain and dietary undigested neutral detergent fiber concentration affected chewing behavior, ruminal pH, and total tract nutrient digestibility of heifers fed a high-grain diet.

Authors:  Tao Ran; Atef M Saleem; Karen A Beauchemin; Gregory B Penner; Wenzhu Yang
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Compositional Analysis of Whole Grains, Processed Grains, Grain Co-Products, and Other Carbohydrate Sources with Applicability to Pet Animal Nutrition.

Authors:  Alison N Beloshapka; Preston R Buff; George C Fahey; Kelly S Swanson
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2016-03-25

4.  Feeding a high-energy finishing diet upon arrival to high-risk feedlot calves: effects on health, performance, ruminal pH, rumination, serum metabolites, and carcass traits.

Authors:  David M Crawford; John T Richeson; Thomas L Perkins; Kendall L Samuelson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 3.338

5.  Barley grain for ruminants: A global treasure or tragedy.

Authors:  Akbar Nikkhah
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2012-07-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.