Alterations in visual receptive fields in the superior colliculus induced by amphetamine.

Visual response properties were examined in the superficial layers of the superior colliculus (SC) of anesthetized, paralyzed cats before and after i.v. administration of d-amphetamine. Receptive fields (RFs) of single SC units were plotted using small spots of light presented to the contralateral eye. Within the first hour following d-amphetamine injections, RF size gradually increased, reaching a maximum 86 min post-injection. On average, the area of the RF increased by 5.6 times and RF expansion was observed in all single units examined in the superficial layers. Over the subsequent 4-8 h following the injection, RF area gradually decreased and returned to control dimensions. Most RFs displayed asymmetrical patterns of expansion, showing relatively more horizontal than vertical growth. As RF expansion developed, responses to stimuli flashed "on" and "off" at various locations both inside and outside the borders of the control RF became progressively more vigorous. In contrast, no significant changes were noted in direction-selective responses at any time after d-amphetamine injections. Using an array of light bar stimuli of different lengths, the strength of surround suppression was found to be significantly diminished by d-amphetamine. The reduction in surround suppression was especially clear for bar lengths which exceeded the diameter of the control RF. No RF expansion was observed in the superficial layers of the SC when d-amphetamine was injected intravitreally. Furthermore, d-amphetamine had no discernable effect on the RF sizes of cells in the visual cortex. These results suggest that the RF changes in the SC were not of either retinal or cortical origin. We conclude that the mean retinal area which can potentially influence the activity of RFs in the superficial layers of the SC may be on average over 5 times greater than the RF area determined using conventional methods and criteria. These findings raise the interesting possibility that the relatively small size and sharp borders characteristic of RFs in the superficial layers arise from local inhibitory networks which delimit a broader field of excitatory activity supplied by retinal and cortical afferent terminals. Thus, in order to generate the RF changes observed here, either these local inhibitory circuits are amphetamine sensitive, or more likely, these inhibitory networks are dynamically modulated by an, as yet unidentified, amphetamine-sensitive input affecting visual RFs in the superficial layers.