Literature DB >> 8453016

Partial rescreening of all negative smears: an improved method of quality assurance in laboratories undertaking cervical screening.

C A Faraker1.   

Abstract

Partial rescreening was carried out on 9633 cervical smears reported as negative by standard screening. Each slide was 'step-screened' at normal speed for 30 s. Thirteen false negative smears were detected by this method. No false negatives were revealed by conventionally rescreening 10% of the same study group. The sensitivity of the method was assessed by 'step-screening' 100 known positive smears. Of this group 92 were detected. The results indicate that partial rescreening is a sensitive method of quality assurance and should replace conventional 10% proportional rescreening, which is ineffective.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8453016     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.1993.tb00072.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytopathology        ISSN: 0956-5507            Impact factor:   2.073


  3 in total

1.  Rapid review (partial rescreening) of cervical cytology. Four years experience and quality assurance implications.

Authors:  C A Faraker; M E Boxer
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Role of re-screening of cervical smears in internal quality control.

Authors:  A Baker; D Melcher; R Smith
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Quality control for normal liquid-based cytology: rescreening, high-risk HPV targeted reviewing and/or high-risk HPV detection?

Authors:  Christophe E Depuydt; Marc Arbyn; Ina H Benoy; Johan Vandepitte; Annie J Vereecken; Johannes J Bogers
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2008-06-09       Impact factor: 5.310

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.