| Literature DB >> 8453016 |
Abstract
Partial rescreening was carried out on 9633 cervical smears reported as negative by standard screening. Each slide was 'step-screened' at normal speed for 30 s. Thirteen false negative smears were detected by this method. No false negatives were revealed by conventionally rescreening 10% of the same study group. The sensitivity of the method was assessed by 'step-screening' 100 known positive smears. Of this group 92 were detected. The results indicate that partial rescreening is a sensitive method of quality assurance and should replace conventional 10% proportional rescreening, which is ineffective.Mesh:
Year: 1993 PMID: 8453016 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.1993.tb00072.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cytopathology ISSN: 0956-5507 Impact factor: 2.073