Literature DB >> 8452847

Long-term results after maxillary advancement in patients with clefts.

W Hochban1, C Ganss, K H Austermann.   

Abstract

In order to evaluate relapse tendencies after maxillary advancement, 31 patients were examined preoperatively, postoperatively, and 1 year postoperatively; 14 of whom had clefts of the lip, alveolus, and palate. Patients with maxillary deficiency were selected in a method that mere sagittal displacement was planned. Any patients with major vertical or transverse changes or additional mandibular surgery were excluded. Treatment consisted of maxillary advancement by Le Fort I osteotomy and miniplate fixation. Besides clinical examination, skeletal and dental changes were assessed cephalometrically. Results revealed a certain relapse tendency of the displacement in the noncleft group that compared favorably to the cleft group. This relapse is dependent on the amount of advancement. Despite minor differences, the two groups did not differ significantly based on maxillary advancement, so besides advancement surgery there must be another factor, cleft, to explain the different relapse tendencies between patients with and without clefts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8452847     DOI: 10.1597/1545-1569_1993_030_0237_ltrama_2.3.co_2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J        ISSN: 1055-6656


  7 in total

1.  LeFort I Osteotomy.

Authors:  Edward P Buchanan; Charles H Hyman
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Limitations of internal distraction devices in mature patients with cleft lip and palate and severe midface hypoplasia.

Authors:  Jan Rustemeyer; Alexander Busch; Andreas Bremerich
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-07-27

3.  A clinical evaluation of midface advancement using intraoral distractors in management of bone stock deficiencies.

Authors:  Ramen Sinha; P Suresh Menon; M G Venugopal
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-08-07

4.  Maxillary distraction osteogenesis at Le Fort-I level induces bone apposition at infraorbital rim.

Authors:  Vidya Rattan; Ashok Kumar Jena; Satinder Pal Singh; Ashok Kumar Utreja
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 5.  Long-term skeletal stability after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis in cleft lip and palate patients.

Authors:  Humam Saltaji; Michael P Major; Mostafa Altalibi; Mohamed Youssef; Carlos Flores-Mir
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Biomechanical comparison of two intraoperative mobilization techniques for maxillary distraction osteogenesis: Down-fracture versus non-down-fracture.

Authors:  Lili Yang; Eduardo Yugo Suzuki; Boonsiva Suzuki
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014 Jul-Dec

7.  Three-Dimensional Outcome Assessments of Surgical Correction in Cleft and Noncleft Patients with Class III Skeletal Relation: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Te-Ju Wu; Cheng-Chun Wu; Chi-Yu Tsai; Yi-Hao Lee; Yu-Jen Chang; Shiu-Shiung Lin; Jui-Pin Lai
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.