Literature DB >> 8450757

Forbidden synonymous substitutions in coding regions.

R J Britten1.   

Abstract

In the evolution of highly conserved genes, a few "synonymous" substitutions at third bases that would not alter the protein sequence are forbidden or very rare, presumably as a result of functional requirements of the gene or the messenger RNA. Another 10% or 20% of codons are significantly less variable by synonymous substitution than are the majority of codons. The changes that occur at the majority of third bases are subject to codon usage restrictions. These usage restrictions control sequence similarities between very distant genes. For example, 70% of third bases are identical in calmodulin genes of man and trypanosome. Third-base similarities of distant genes for conserved proteins are mathematically predicted, on the basis of the G+C composition of third bases. These observations indicate the need for reexamination of methods used to calculate synonymous substitutions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8450757     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a039996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  5 in total

1.  Specific compositional patterns of synonymous positions in homologous mammalian genes.

Authors:  S Zoubak; G D'Onofrio; S Cacciò; G Bernardi; G Bernardi
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Comparative genetic analysis of Mycobacterium ulcerans and Mycobacterium marinum reveals evidence of recent divergence.

Authors:  T P Stinear; G A Jenkin; P D Johnson; J K Davies
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Enhancement of Methane Catalysis Rates in Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b.

Authors:  Dipayan Samanta; Tanvi Govil; Priya Saxena; Venkata Gadhamshetty; Lee R Krumholz; David R Salem; Rajesh K Sani
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-04-09

4.  Evolution of actin gene families of sea urchins.

Authors:  H Fang; B P Brandhorst
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Does codon bias have an evolutionary origin?

Authors:  Jan C Biro
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 2.432

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.