Literature DB >> 8450582

Muscle mass of competitive male athletes.

L F Spenst1, A D Martin, D T Drinkwater.   

Abstract

The recent publication of the first validated equation for the estimation of muscle mass (MM) in men has made possible a comparison of MM in athletes from different sports. Limb girths and skinfold thicknesses were measured in 62 male athletes (aged 17-38 years) and 13 non-athletic males (aged 22-36 years). The MM (g) was calculated from the equation MM = S(0.0553 Gt2 + 0.0987 Gf2 + 0.0331 Gc2)-2445, where S is stature, Gt is the mid-thigh girth corrected for the front thigh skinfold thickness, Gc is the maximum calf girth corrected for the calf skinfold thickness and Gf is the uncorrected maximum forearm girth (all in cm). The athletes were classified as gymnasts (n = 10), basketball players (n = 10), body-builders (n = 10), track and field power athletes (n = 12), track and field long sprinters (n = 10) or distance runners (n = 10). The MM means ranged from 38.4 kg for the distance runners to 58.7 kg for the body-builders. Both body-builders and basketball players had significantly greater MM than gymnasts, long sprinters, non-athletic males and distance runners (P < 0.01). Also, MM was greater in track and field power athletes than in distance runners (P < 0.05). The MM as a percentage of body mass (%MM) ranged from 56.5% in the non-athletic group to 65.1% in the body-builders; body-builders scored higher than basketball players (P < 0.05), distance runners (P < 0.01) and the non-athletic group (P < 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8450582     DOI: 10.1080/02640419308729956

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  5 in total

1.  Force-velocity relationship profile of elbow flexors in male gymnasts.

Authors:  Miyuki Nakatani; Kensuke Murata; Hiroaki Kanehisa; Yohei Takai
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  A Systematic Review on Fitness Testing in Adult Male Basketball Players: Tests Adopted, Characteristics Reported and Recommendations for Practice.

Authors:  Matthew Morrison; David T Martin; Scott Talpey; Aaron T Scanlan; Jace Delaney; Shona L Halson; Jonathon Weakley
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 11.928

3.  Physical, Psychological, and Body Composition Differences between Active and Sedentary Adolescents According to the "Fat but Fit" Paradigm.

Authors:  Adrián Mateo-Orcajada; Raquel Vaquero-Cristóbal; Francisco Esparza-Ros; Lucía Abenza-Cano
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  MUSCLE INJURIES IN ATHLETES.

Authors:  Guilherme Campos Barroso; Edilson Schwansee Thiele
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-11-17

5.  A comparison of body composition assessment methods in climbers: Which is better?

Authors:  María José Arias Téllez; Fernando Carrasco; Vanesa España Romero; Jorge Inostroza; Alejandro Bustamante; Ignacio Solar Altamirano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.