Literature DB >> 8450165

Dobutamine stress echocardiography predicts surgical outcome in patients with an aortic aneurysm and peripheral vascular disease.

V G Dávila-Román1, A D Waggoner, G A Sicard, E M Geltman, K B Schechtman, J E Pérez.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to assess the utility of dobutamine stress echocardiography for determining the presence of significant coronary artery disease and for predicting surgical outcome and long-term prognosis in patients scheduled to undergo peripheral vascular or aortic aneurysm surgery.
BACKGROUND: Assessment of coronary artery disease in patients scheduled to undergo peripheral vascular surgery can avoid perioperative complications.
METHODS: Dobutamine stress echocardiography was performed in 98 consecutive patients scheduled to undergo aortic or peripheral vascular surgery. Intravenous dobutamine was infused in a graded fashion, with two-dimensional digital echocardiographic monitoring of ventricular function and segmental wall motion. Group 1 (n = 70) consisted of patients who exhibited a normal response to dobutamine infusion (negative dobutamine study); group 2 (n = 23) comprised those patients with an abnormal response to dobutamine, characterized by the development of new or worsening wall motion abnormalities at rest, indicating the presence of myocardial ischemia (positive dobutamine study). Five patients with an inconclusive dobutamine study (because of inadequate heart rate) were excluded from analysis.
RESULTS: No major adverse effects occurred with testing in any patient. Sixty-eight of 70 patients with a negative study had peripheral vascular or aortic surgery performed without perioperative cardiac events (2 patients refused surgery). Nineteen of 23 patients with a positive study underwent coronary angiography and all had > 50% lumen narrowing in one or more major coronary artery distributions; 13 underwent coronary artery bypass grafting or angioplasty before peripheral vascular or aortic surgery and all had an uneventful perioperative period. Four of the 10 patients from group 2 who did not undergo coronary revascularization had a perioperative cardiac event (myocardial infarction in 2, an ischemic episode requiring urgent coronary bypass grafting in 1 and congestive heart failure in 1).
CONCLUSIONS: Positive and negative dobutamine study results are significant predictors of the presence or absence of perioperative events (20% vs. 0%, p = 0.003). A positive test warrants coronary angiography and further medical or surgical intervention, or both, but a negative test indicates a low likelihood of perioperative cardiac complications of aortic or peripheral vascular surgery. During the long-term follow-up period in this study (group 1 mean, 24 months; group 2 mean, 15 months), two patients (3%) from group 1 and three (15%) from group 2 developed cardiac complications (p = 0.038). Thus, dobutamine stress echocardiography is safe and can predict surgical outcome in patients undergoing aortic aneurysm repair or surgery for occlusive disease of the peripheral arteries. In addition, a negative test result is a strong predictor of decreased perioperative and long-term cardiac morbidity and mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8450165     DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90353-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  10 in total

1.  Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in the pre-operative assessment of patients for repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  A M Nugent; M Riley; J Megarry; M J O'Reilly; J MacMahon; R Lowry
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1998 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Preoperative cardiac risk assessment for noncardiac surgery.

Authors:  J A Leppo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  The role of stress echocardiography versus stress perfusion: a view from the other side.

Authors:  F A Chaudhry
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Infarcts after surgery.

Authors:  N Mamode; S Cobbe; J G Pollock
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-05-13

Review 5.  Preoperative cardiac risk assessment for noncardiac surgery.

Authors:  S A Abraham; K A Eagle
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  A meta-analysis comparing the prognostic accuracy of six diagnostic tests for predicting perioperative cardiac risk in patients undergoing major vascular surgery.

Authors:  M D Kertai; E Boersma; J J Bax; M H Heijenbrok-Kal; M G M Hunink; G J L'talien; J R T C Roelandt; H van Urk; D Poldermans
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Impact of routine coronary catheterization in low extremity artery disease undergoing percutaneous transluminal angioplasty: study protocol for a multi-center randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  I-Chih Chen; Cheng-Han Lee; Ting-Hsing Chao; Wei-Kung Tseng; Tsung-Hsien Lin; Wen-Jung Chung; Jen-Kwan Li; Hsuan-Li Huang; Ping-Yen Liu; Ting-Kuang Chao; Chuin-Yuan Chu; Chih-Chan Lin; Po-Chao Hsu; Wen-Huang Lee; Po-Tseng Lee; Yi-Heng Li; Shih-Ya Tseng; Liang-Miin Tsai; Juey-Jen Hwang
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 8.  The clinical use of stress echocardiography in ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  Rosa Sicari; Lauro Cortigiani
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 2.062

Review 9.  Perioperative risk stratification in non cardiac surgery: role of pharmacological stress echocardiography.

Authors:  Rosa Sicari
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2004-05-12       Impact factor: 2.062

Review 10.  Preoperative evaluation of the cardiac patient for noncardiac surgery.

Authors:  L A Fleisher; P G Barash
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.