Literature DB >> 8450164

Digital supine bicycle stress echocardiography: a new technique for evaluating coronary artery disease.

H S Hecht1, L DeBord, R Shaw, R Dunlap, C Ryan, S H Stertzer, R K Myler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of digital supine bicycle stress echocardiography, a new technique for evaluating coronary artery disease during peak exercise.
BACKGROUND: Prior stress echocardiographic techniques have not utilized peak exercise imaging to determine the extent and location of coronary artery disease.
METHODS: Two-hundred twenty-two patients were studied: 180 underwent both supine bicycle stress echocardiography and coronary arteriography; 42 had a < 5% likelihood of disease. Forty-three patients had normal coronary arteries, 55 had single-vessel, 42 had double-vessel and 40 had triple-vessel coronary artery disease.
RESULTS: Supine bicycle stress echocardiography was 93% sensitive, 86% specific and 92% accurate for identifying patients with coronary artery disease irrespective of prior myocardial infarction or achievement of > or = 85% maximal predicted heart rate. The "normalcy" rate in the low probability group was 100%. Supine bicycle stress echocardiography was 87% sensitive, 89% specific and 88% accurate for specific vessel identification. The sensitivity was greatest for the left anterior descending compared with the right coronary artery and the left circumflex coronary artery (95% vs. 81% vs. 78%, p < 0.01) and for vessels in patients with double- and triple-vessel compared with single-vessel disease (90% vs. 89% vs. 78%, p < 0.05). The procedure was significantly more sensitive for detection of vessels with 90% to 100% compared with 50% to 70% diameter stenosis (91% vs. 81%, p < 0.05) and was 88% correct in the prediction of multivessel disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Supine bicycle stress echocardiography is a highly accurate tool for evaluating coronary artery disease, identifying both the patient with coronary artery disease and the location and extent of disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8450164     DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90352-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  6 in total

1.  A meta-analytic comparison of echocardiographic stressors.

Authors:  Yoshinori Noguchi; Shizuko Nagata-Kobayashi; James E Stahl; John B Wong
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Diagnosis of ischemic heart disease with exercise echocardiography: Comparison of images obtained at peak- and post-exercise.

Authors:  Yutaka Hirano; Tadahiko Yamamoto; Hisakazu Uehara; Yoshinao Ozasa; Satoru Yamada; Hiroshi Ikawa; Kinji Ishikawa
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 3.  Myocardial perfusion imaging versus two-dimensional echocardiography: comparative value in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  M S Verani
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Reproducibility of stress echocardiography using intravenous injection of ultrasound contrast agent (BY 963).

Authors:  R Leischik; C Kuhlmann; C Bruch; A Jeremias; T Buck; R Erbel
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1997-10

Review 5.  A consideration of current clinical options for stress imaging in the diagnosis and evaluation of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  E H Botvinick
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  Early Diagnosis of Cardiovascular Diseases in Workers: Role of Standard and Advanced Echocardiography.

Authors:  Lidia Capotosto; Francesco Massoni; Simone De Sio; Serafino Ricci; Antonio Vitarelli
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.