Literature DB >> 8450105

America's angriest home videos: behavioral contingencies observed in home reenactments of marital conflict.

B Burman1, G Margolin, R S John.   

Abstract

Sequential analysis was used to compare the conflictual marital interactions of physically aggressive (PA, n = 17), verbally aggressive (VA, n = 15), withdrawing (WI, n = 18), and nondistressed, low-conflict (ND, n = 15) couples to describe behavior patterns characteristic of couples who report different marital conflict styles. Videotapes of couples enacting typical conflicts in their own homes were coded with a system designed to capture the affective aspects of communication. PA couples were characterized by the reciprocity of hostile affect and by rigid, highly contingent behavior patterns that were both stronger and longer lasting than those of other conflictual, but nonviolent, couples. In a limited way, ND couples demonstrated some of the same negative behavior patterns as the conflictual couples, but they were able to exit these negative interaction cycles quickly, which underscores the importance of further research into the de-escalation of conflict.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8450105     DOI: 10.1037//0022-006x.61.1.28

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol        ISSN: 0022-006X


  15 in total

Review 1.  Observation of couple conflicts: clinical assessment applications, stubborn truths, and shaky foundations.

Authors:  R E Heyman
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2001-03

Review 2.  The nuts and bolts of behavioral observation of marital and family interaction.

Authors:  G Margolin; P H Oliver; E B Gordis; H G O'Hearn; A M Medina; C M Ghosh; L Morland
Journal:  Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-12

3.  Conflict Resolution in Mexican-Origin Couples: Culture, Gender, and Marital Quality.

Authors:  Lorey A Wheeler; Kimberly A Updegraff; Shawna M Thayer
Journal:  J Marriage Fam       Date:  2010-08

4.  Reading others emotions: The role of intuitive judgments in predicting marital satisfaction, quality, and stability.

Authors:  Robert J Waldinger; Stuart T Hauser; Marc S Schulz; Joseph P Allen; Judith A Crowell
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2004-03

5.  A proximal change experiment testing two communication exercises with intimate partner violent men.

Authors:  Julia C Babcock; Katherine Graham; Brittany Canady; Jody M Ross
Journal:  Behav Ther       Date:  2011-02-24

6.  Differential Predictors of Intimate Partner Sexual Coercion Versus Physical Assault Perpetration.

Authors:  Alexandra L Snead; Julia C Babcock
Journal:  J Sex Aggress       Date:  2019-03-01

7.  Dyadic Dynamics in Young Couples Reporting Dating Violence: An Actor-Partner Interdependence Model.

Authors:  Alison Paradis; Martine Hébert; Mylène Fernet
Journal:  J Interpers Violence       Date:  2015-05-11

8.  Measurement and correlates of intimate partner violence among expectant first-time parents.

Authors:  Marni L Kan; Mark E Feinberg
Journal:  Violence Vict       Date:  2010

Review 9.  Anger, hostility, internalizing negative emotions, and intimate partner violence perpetration: A meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Erica L Birkley; Christopher I Eckhardt
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2015-01-12

10.  Daily patterns of stress and conflict in couples: Associations with marital aggression and family-of-origin aggression.

Authors:  Adela C Timmons; Reout Arbel; Gayla Margolin
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2016-08-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.