Literature DB >> 8449090

Noninvasive pressure support ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure.

M Wysocki1, L Tric, M A Wolff, J Gertner, H Millet, B Herman.   

Abstract

To further delineate indications for noninvasive pressure support ventilation (NIPSV), we proposed this noninvasive technique as an alternative to endotracheal intubation in 17 consecutive patients with acute respiratory failure from various causes. Eight patients (47 percent) were successfully ventilated with NIPSV, while in 9 (53 percent), NIPSV failed. Gas exchange values before initiating NIPSV were different between the 2 groups: patients successfully ventilated with NIPSV had a higher PaCO2 (57 +/- 15 mm Hg vs 37 +/- 17 mm Hg; p = 0.01), a lower pH (7.33 +/- 0.03 vs 7.45 +/- 0.08; p = 0.02), and a lower alveolo-arterial oxygen pressure difference (P[A-a]O2) (144 +/- 46 mm Hg vs 265 +/- 18 mm Hg; p = 0.01), suggesting that CO2 retention without major hypoxemia is a better indication for NIPSV than severe hypoxemia alone. Acute respiratory failure occurring after extubation seemed to be a good indication for NIPSV, with an 83 percent rate of success. In both groups of patients, gas exchange improved after 1 h on NIPSV, but such values were not improved on the first day in patients who failed with NIPSV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8449090     DOI: 10.1378/chest.103.3.907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  15 in total

1.  Non-invasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure.

Authors: 
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 2.  Management of an acute exacerbation of copd: are we ignoring the evidence?

Authors:  M K Johnson; R D Stevenson
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 3.  Nasal ventilation.

Authors:  A K Simonds
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 4.  Mechanical ventilation of the patient with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  M T Gladwin; D J Pierson
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  A comparative study of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) in patients with flail chest.

Authors:  M Gunduz; H Unlugenc; M Ozalevli; K Inanoglu; H Akman
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Effectiveness of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation differs between decompensated chronic restrictive and obstructive pulmonary disease patients.

Authors:  Christophe Robino; Christophe Faisy; Jean-Luc Diehl; Nacer Rezgui; Jacques Labrousse; Emmanuel Guerot
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-02-13       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Physiological effects and optimisation of nasal assist-control ventilation for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in respiratory failure.

Authors:  C Girault; V Chevron; J C Richard; I Daudenthun; P Pasquis; J Leroy; G Bonmarchand
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 9.139

8.  Facial skin breakdown in patients with non-invasive ventilation devices: report of two cases and indications for treatment and prevention.

Authors:  Michele Maruccia; Martina Ruggieri; Maria G Onesti
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 3.315

9.  Physiologic evaluation of non-invasive pressure support ventilation in trauma patients with acute respiratory failure.

Authors:  C Gregoretti; F Beltrame; U Lucangelo; L Burbi; G Conti; M Turello; D Gregori
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Effect of pressures and type of ventilation on aerosol delivery to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients.

Authors:  Marina E Boules; Nabila Ibrahim Laz; Ahmed A Elberry; Raghda R S Hussein; Mohamed E A Abdelrahim
Journal:  Beni Suef Univ J Basic Appl Sci       Date:  2022-04-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.