Literature DB >> 8448401

Analysis of MR phase-contrast measurements of pulsatile velocity waveforms.

N J Hangiandreou1, P J Rossman, S J Riederer.   

Abstract

Errors in the measurement of the mean velocity of pulsatile velocity waveforms with ungated phase-contrast techniques were studied theoretically and experimentally. Waveforms consisting of a constant and two sinusoidal components were analyzed. Variations in magnitude and phase of the vascular magnetic resonance (MR) signal resulted in errors, the severity of which increased when either factor increased. Magnitude variations always resulted in overestimation. The general shape of the waveform greatly influenced the error, with certain waveforms producing greater inherent error than others. Experimental measurements were performed, validating the predicted sensitivity of these errors to changes in imaging parameters, including TR and flow-encoding sensitivity. Errors generally became more severe with increased flow-encoding sensitivity. The theoretical and experimental results suggest that accurate mean velocity measurements in many vessels of the body--with acquisition times of less than 15 seconds--should be attainable with ungated imaging techniques and with careful selection of relevant imaging parameters.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8448401     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1880030214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  5 in total

1.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Quantitative Flow Imaging in Human Umbilical Vessels In Utero Using Nongated 2D Phase Contrast MRI.

Authors:  Uday Krishnamurthy; Brijesh K Yadav; Pavan K Jella; Ewart Mark Haacke; Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Swati Mody; Lami Yeo; Sonia S Hassan; Roberto Romero; Jaladhar Neelavalli
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-12-23       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Comparison of global cerebral blood flow measured by phase-contrast mapping MRI with 15 O-H2 O positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Mark Bitsch Vestergaard; Ulrich Lindberg; Niels Jacob Aachmann-Andersen; Kristian Lisbjerg; Søren Just Christensen; Peter Rasmussen; Niels Vidiendal Olsen; Ian Law; Henrik Bo Wiberg Larsson; Otto Mølby Henriksen
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Fetal hemodynamics and cardiac streaming assessed by 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance in fetal sheep.

Authors:  Eric M Schrauben; Brahmdeep Singh Saini; Jack R T Darby; Jia Yin Soo; Mitchell C Lock; Elaine Stirrat; Greg Stortz; John G Sled; Janna L Morrison; Mike Seed; Christopher K Macgowan
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 5.364

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.