Literature DB >> 8447770

The effect of post adaptation in the root canal on retention of posts cemented with various cements.

F W Chan1, J K Harcourt, P J Brockhurst.   

Abstract

This laboratory study compared the retention of prefabricated posts in well-fitting and loose-fitting post canals using different cement materials. Eighty-three human teeth were prepared for post placement. One of zinc phosphate cement, polycarboxylate cement, glass ionomer cement or resin cement was used to cement each post in place. A tensile force was applied to remove each post and the separation force was recorded. Posts cemented with the resin cement were the most difficult to dislodge. Posts cemented into loose-fitting canals exhibited greater resistance to dislodgment than posts cemented into well-fitting canals irrespective of the type of cements used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8447770     DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1993.tb05449.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Dent J        ISSN: 0045-0421            Impact factor:   2.291


  9 in total

1.  Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of various post systems using different luting agents under tangential loading.

Authors:  Rajnish Aggarwal; Swati Gupta; Amrit Tandan; Narendra Kumar Gupta; Ravi Dwivedi; Renu Aggarwal
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2013-04-17

2.  Influence of ultrasound, with and without water spray cooling, on removal of posts cemented with resin or glass ionomer cements: An in-vitro study.

Authors:  M S Adarsha; D A Lata
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2010-07

3.  Waiting time for coronal preparation and the influence of different cements on tensile strength of metal posts.

Authors:  Ilione Kruschewsky Costa Sousa Oliveira; Ynara Bosco de Oliveira Lima Arsati; Roberta Tarkany Basting; Fabiana Mantovani Gomes França
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-01-15

4.  Effect of tapering internal coronal walls on fracture resistance of anterior teeth treated with cast post and core: In vitro study.

Authors:  Loubna Shamseddine; Rita Eid; Fodda Homsy; Hasan Elhusseini
Journal:  J Dent Biomech       Date:  2014-08-12

5.  Comparison of the Microtensile Bond Strength of a Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) Tooth Post Cemented with Various Surface Treatments and Various Resin Cements.

Authors:  Chan-Hong Song; Jae-Won Choi; Young-Chan Jeon; Chang-Mo Jeong; So-Hyoun Lee; Eun-Sook Kang; Mi-Jung Yun; Jung-Bo Huh
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Retention of Cast Posts Cemented with Two Commonly Used Conventional and Two Resin Cements and the Mode of Root Fracture Following Their Removal.

Authors:  Azadeh Hesarkhani; Farnoush Fotovat; Fatemeh Saneian; Hosein Akbari; Hanif Allahbakhshi
Journal:  Front Dent       Date:  2021-10-17

Review 7.  Cement selection criteria for different types of intracanal posts.

Authors:  Safoura Ghodsi; Mohammad Mostafa Aghamohseni; Sarah Arzani; Sasan Rasaeipour; Mina Shekarian
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2022-07-18

8.  Fracture resistance of teeth restored with cast post and core: An in vitro study.

Authors:  S Mankar; N S Mohan Kumar; J V Karunakaran; S Senthil Kumar
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2012-08

9.  A survey of failed post-retained restorations.

Authors:  A Peutzfeldt; A Sahafi; E Asmussen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 3.573

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.