Literature DB >> 8446248

Prognosis of acute tubular necrosis: an extended prospectively contrasted study.

F Liaño1, A Gallego, J Pascual, F García-Martín, J L Teruel, R Marcén, L Orofino, L Orte, M Rivera, N Gallego.   

Abstract

The ability to predict the outcome in acute tubular necrosis (ATN) remains elusive despite considerable efforts. Accurate prediction is a crucial priority and has large economical and ethical implications, mainly to judge when treatment is futile and further efforts only prolong miserable agony. To analyze the influence of risk factors in the prognosis of ATN, we applied, in an initial phase, a prospective protocol of demographic data, cause of renal failure, diuresis, need of dialysis and clinical conditions in 228 patients using multiple linear and logistic regression models. In a control phase with 100 consecutive patients, we checked the accuracy of the results previously obtained, evaluating further the overall population of 328 patients in a synthetic phase. Finally, the validation of the equations obtained was verified in 25 patients from another hospital. As a complement of this 4-phase study, detailed statistical comparisons between both linear and logistic multiple regression models were undertaken. Correlation between probability of death obtained with equations from the initial phase applied to control patients and real evolution of these patients, survival or death, was excellent. The study of the synthetic phase revealed coma, assisted respiration, hypotension, oliguria and jaundice as having an independent positive influence on mortality and nephrotoxic etiology and normal consciousness on good prognosis. For the linear model, the same cut-off point of discriminant score (0.9) above which there were no chances for survival could be established in the 4 phases. With the logistic model, it only was found at later phases. The multiple linear was better than the logistic regression model in terms of better correlation with real mortality, better sensitivity and specificity intervals, easier use of discriminant cut-off point and better adjustment of distribution of standardized residuals to expected normal function. Early prognosis of ATN is possible and can be given using simple clinical features. A discriminant score allows to distinguish patients without chances for survival. The multiple linear is better than the logistic regression model in the prediction of the outcome in ATN.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8446248     DOI: 10.1159/000187139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephron        ISSN: 1660-8151            Impact factor:   2.847


  31 in total

1.  Metabolic implications of peritoneal dialysis in patients with acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Cassiana Regina Góes; Marina Nogueira Berbel; Andre Luis Balbi; Daniela Ponce
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 2.  Mechanisms and mediators of lung injury after acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Sarah Faubel; Charles L Edelstein
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 28.314

3.  Clinical cause of presumed acute tubular necrosis requiring renal replacement therapy and outcome of critically ill patients: post hoc analysis of a prospective 7-year cohort study.

Authors:  H Schiffl; R Fischer
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Epidemiology of acute renal failure and outcome of haemodiafiltration in intensive care.

Authors:  B Schwilk; H Wiedeck; B Stein; H Reinelt; H Treiber; U Bothner
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Validation of Liano score in acute renal failure: a prospective study in Indian patients.

Authors:  Veena P Varricatt; N R Rau; Ravindra Prabhu Attur; Waqas Wahid Baig
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 2.801

6.  A randomized clinical trial of high volume peritoneal dialysis versus extended daily hemodialysis for acute kidney injury patients.

Authors:  D Ponce; M N Berbel; J M G Abrão; C R Goes; A L Balbi
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Prognosis for children with acute kidney injury in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Nilzete Bresolin; Carlos Silva; Ana Halllal; Julio Toporovski; Vera Fernandes; Jose Góes; Francisca Ligia Carvalho
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 3.714

8.  Fluid accumulation, recognition and staging of acute kidney injury in critically-ill patients.

Authors:  Etienne Macedo; Josée Bouchard; Sharon H Soroko; Glenn M Chertow; Jonathan Himmelfarb; T Alp Ikizler; Emil P Paganini; Ravindra L Mehta
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Macrophage stimulating protein may promote tubular regeneration after acute injury.

Authors:  Vincenzo Cantaluppi; Luigi Biancone; Giuseppe Mauriello Romanazzi; Federico Figliolini; Silvia Beltramo; Francesco Galimi; Maria Gavina Camboni; Elisa Deriu; Piergiulio Conaldi; Antonella Bottelli; Viviana Orlandi; Maria Beatriz Herrera; Alfonso Pacitti; Giuseppe Paolo Segoloni; Giovanni Camussi
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 10.121

10.  Case mix, outcome and activity for patients with severe acute kidney injury during the first 24 hours after admission to an adult, general critical care unit: application of predictive models from a secondary analysis of the ICNARC Case Mix Programme database.

Authors:  Nitin V Kolhe; Paul E Stevens; Alex V Crowe; Graham W Lipkin; David A Harrison
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2008-10-13       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.