Literature DB >> 8445815

Temporal and geographic trends in the autopsy frequency of blunt and penetrating trauma deaths in the United States.

D A Pollock1, J M O'Neil, R G Parrish, D L Combs, J L Annest.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine national trends in the percentage of blunt and penetrating trauma deaths autopsied. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: For each year from 1980 through 1989, we used national mortality data files to determine the autopsy frequency (percentage of deaths autopsied) of all deaths in the United States. We analyzed variation in the autopsy frequency of blunt and penetrating trauma deaths by cause of injury and place of occurrence of death.
RESULTS: The autopsy frequency of blunt and penetrating trauma deaths in the United States increased by 14.3% during the 1980s to 58.9% in 1989 (62,004 of 105,309 deaths autopsied), while the autopsy frequency of all deaths decreased by 23.6% during the same period to 11.5% in 1989 (248,272 of 2,153,859 deaths autopsied). Among trauma deaths, homicides remained far more likely to be autopsied than nonhomicides (deaths due to unintentional injuries, suicides, and injuries of undetermined intentionality). The autopsy frequency of homicidal trauma deaths in 1989 was 90.0% or higher in 44 states and ranged from 79.6% in Mississippi to 100.0% in six states. The autopsy frequency of nonhomicidal trauma deaths in 1989 was 90.0% or higher in two states and ranged from 10.3% in Oklahoma to 94.5% in Hawaii. Nationwide, we found significant differences in the autopsy frequency of trauma deaths in 1989 between metropolitan and nonmetropolitan counties, both for homicides (97.7% vs 89.3%; P < .001) and nonhomicides (58.2% vs 29.9%; P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of blunt and penetrating trauma deaths autopsied has increased recently in the United States, but extensive geographic variation in autopsy frequency suggests that the benefits of autopsy findings for trauma care quality improvement and public health surveillance of injuries are distributed unevenly throughout the nation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8445815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  5 in total

1.  Clinical or postmortem? The importance of the autopsy; a retrospective study.

Authors:  Mariana Costache; Anca Mihaela Lazaroiu; Andreea Contolenco; Diana Costache; Simion George; Maria Sajin; Oana Maria Patrascu
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2014-09

2.  Synergistic Effects of Forensic Medicine and Traumatology: Comparison of Clinical Diagnosis Autopsy Findings in Trauma-Related Deaths.

Authors:  Uwe Schmidt; Delovan Oramary; Konrad Kamin; Claas T Buschmann; Christian Kleber
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Autopsy rates among patients reported with AIDS.

Authors:  B Schable; S Y Chu
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Epidemiology and contemporary patterns of trauma deaths: changing place, similar pace, older face.

Authors:  Kjetil Søreide; Andreas J Krüger; Anne Line Vårdal; Christian Lycke Ellingsen; Eldar Søreide; Hans Morten Lossius
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Skull fracture and haemorrhage pattern among fatal and nonfatal head injury assault victims - a critical analysis.

Authors:  Saurabh Chattopadhyay; Chandrabhal Tripathi
Journal:  J Inj Violence Res       Date:  2010-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.