O M Pedersen1, A Aslaksen, H Vik-Mo. 1. Department of Clinical Physiology, Haukeland Hospital, University of Bergen, Norway.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to establish ultrasonographic criteria for the normal size of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries in patients without vascular disease. METHODS: The luminal diameters of the proximal and distal abdominal aorta and the common iliac arteries were measured by ultrasonography in 160 patients (15 to 89 years) who were without known vascular disease. RESULTS: In patients above 50 years of age the distal aorta, which most often is involved in aneurysmatic dilations, measured 16.8 +/- 2.9 mm in men and 14.6 +/- 1.9 mm in women (p < 0.001). The diameter of the iliac artery in these patients was 10.1 +/- 2.0 mm in men and 9.2 +/- 1.3 mm in women (p < 0.001). The usually present gradual narrowing of the aorta toward the bifurcation was replaced by a slight increase (1 to 2 mm) in 5% of the men and 6% of the women. Focal areas of aortic enlargement, however, were not observed. In multivariate analysis, including age, height, body weight, and sex, the distal aortic diameter was significantly correlated only to age (r = 0.46; p < 0.001) and sex (r = -0.29; p < 0.001). With aging the mean of the proximal and distal aortic diameters increased by 0.08 and 0.05 mm/yr, respectively. Also correlated with age was a linear reduction in systolic expansion (r = -0.73; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Enlargement of the distal aorta and common iliac artery should be considered when (1) the luminal diameters in men exceed 23 and 14 mm, respectively, and in women 19 and 12 mm, respectively, (2) the ratio of the proximal and distal aortic diameter exceeds 1.1, and (3) there is demonstration of focal enlargement.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to establish ultrasonographic criteria for the normal size of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries in patients without vascular disease. METHODS: The luminal diameters of the proximal and distal abdominal aorta and the common iliac arteries were measured by ultrasonography in 160 patients (15 to 89 years) who were without known vascular disease. RESULTS: In patients above 50 years of age the distal aorta, which most often is involved in aneurysmatic dilations, measured 16.8 +/- 2.9 mm in men and 14.6 +/- 1.9 mm in women (p < 0.001). The diameter of the iliac artery in these patients was 10.1 +/- 2.0 mm in men and 9.2 +/- 1.3 mm in women (p < 0.001). The usually present gradual narrowing of the aorta toward the bifurcation was replaced by a slight increase (1 to 2 mm) in 5% of the men and 6% of the women. Focal areas of aortic enlargement, however, were not observed. In multivariate analysis, including age, height, body weight, and sex, the distal aortic diameter was significantly correlated only to age (r = 0.46; p < 0.001) and sex (r = -0.29; p < 0.001). With aging the mean of the proximal and distal aortic diameters increased by 0.08 and 0.05 mm/yr, respectively. Also correlated with age was a linear reduction in systolic expansion (r = -0.73; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Enlargement of the distal aorta and common iliac artery should be considered when (1) the luminal diameters in men exceed 23 and 14 mm, respectively, and in women 19 and 12 mm, respectively, (2) the ratio of the proximal and distal aortic diameter exceeds 1.1, and (3) there is demonstration of focal enlargement.
Authors: Venkataramu N Krishnamurthy; Muhammad Naeem; Timothy P Murphy; Joselyn Cerezo; Paul Gaither Jordan; Suzanne H Goldberg; Abby G Ershow; Alan T Hirsch; Niki Oldenburg; Donald E Cutlip Journal: Clin Imaging Date: 2015-09-04 Impact factor: 1.605
Authors: G A Laughlin; M A Allison; N E Jensky; V Aboyans; N D Wong; R Detrano; M H Criqui Journal: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Date: 2011-01-14 Impact factor: 7.069
Authors: Anthony J Young; Austin R Pantel; Varsha Viswanath; Tiffany L Dominguez; Mehran Makvandi; Hsiaoju Lee; Shihong Li; Erin K Schubert; Daniel A Pryma; Michael D Farwell; Robert H Mach; Fiona Simpkins; Lilie L Lin; David A Mankoff; Robert K Doot Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2021-04-16 Impact factor: 11.082
Authors: Michael Bonert; Richard L Leask; Jagdish Butany; C Ross Ethier; Jerry G Myers; K Wayne Johnston; Matadial Ojha Journal: Biomed Eng Online Date: 2003-11-26 Impact factor: 2.819
Authors: Daan van de Pol; Mario Maas; Aart Terpstra; Marja Pannekoek-Hekman; Sena Alaeikhanehshir; P Paul F M Kuijer; R Nils Planken Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-06-02 Impact factor: 5.315