Literature DB >> 8445358

Treatment and biomechanical assessment of patients with chronic sacroiliac joint syndrome.

P J Osterbauer1, K F De Boer, R Widmaier, E Petermann, A W Fuhr.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate diagnostic and biomechanical correlates and treatment outcomes of manipulative/adjustive care in patients highly selected for sacroiliac joint syndrome (SIJS).
DESIGN: Descriptive case series, 1 wk baseline, 1 yr follow-up.
SETTING: Private chiropractic practice. PATIENTS: Ten out of 153 consecutive new patients (4 male and 6 female) with "primary," chronic, uncomplicated SIJS were selected over an 11-mo period on the basis of painful SIJ and provocation tests. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Back pain (visual analogue scale), Oswestry disability index, lumbar provocation tests and biomechanical measures of gait and postural sway. INTERVENTION: Six-wk regimen of mechanical force, manually assisted, short lever adjustments (MFMA) with an Activator instrument.
RESULTS: Pain decreased significantly from a mean baseline value of 25 to 12 (t = 2.28; p < .05). Likewise, the average disability scores diminished from 28 to 13% (t = 2.3; p < .05), and a reduction in the number of positive provocation tests was noted (Fisher Exact Probability range Z = 0.025-0.045). Gait and sway parameters were indistinguishable from normals, before or after treatment. Response to the 1-yr follow-up questionnaire (6/10) revealed stability of symptoms at a low level.
CONCLUSIONS: While the majority of subjects recorded some degree of positive outcome, we conclude that: a) discrete SIJS remains difficult to diagnose, but may be possible by judicious choice of screening tests; b) MFMA may benefit some patients with chronic SIJ pain; and c) gait and sway measurement yielded no correlation with clinical conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8445358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther        ISSN: 0161-4754            Impact factor:   1.437


  6 in total

1.  A review of the literature pertaining to the efficacy, safety, educational requirements, uses and usage of mechanical adjusting devices: Part 2 of 2.

Authors:  Shane H Taylor; Nicole D Arnold; Lesley Biggs; Christopher J Colloca; Dale R Mierau; Bruce P Symons; John J Triano
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2004-06

2.  A review of the literature pertaining to the efficacy, safety, educational requirements, uses and usage of mechanical adjusting devices: Part 1 of 2.

Authors:  Shane H Taylor; Nicole D Arnold; Lesley Biggs; Christopher J Colloca; Dale R Mierau; Bruce P Symons; John J Triano
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2004-03

3.  Clinical effectiveness of the activator adjusting instrument in the management of musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Tiffany Huggins; Ana Luburic Boras; Brian J Gleberzon; Mara Popescu; Lianna A Bahry
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2012-03

4.  Comparison of the Modified Lumbar Pelvic Belt with the Current Belt on Low Back and Pelvic Pain in Pregnant Women.

Authors:  Zhaleh Heydari; Gholamreza Aminian; Akbar Biglarian; Maryam Shokrpour; Mohammad Ali Mardani
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2022-06-01

5.  A systematic review of chiropractic care for fall prevention: rationale, state of the evidence, and recommendations for future research.

Authors:  Weronika Grabowska; Wren Burton; Matthew H Kowalski; Robert Vining; Cynthia R Long; Anthony Lisi; Jeffrey M Hausdorff; Brad Manor; Dennis Muñoz-Vergara; Peter M Wayne
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 2.562

6.  Safety and 6-month effectiveness of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a prospective study.

Authors:  Bradley S Duhon; Daniel J Cher; Kathryn D Wine; Harry Lockstadt; Don Kovalsky; Cheng-Lun Soo
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2013-12-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.