Literature DB >> 8441934

Mechanics of anatomic reduction of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Comparison of distraction versus distraction plus lordosis, in the anatomic reduction of the thoracolumbar burst fracture.

D Zou1, J U Yoo, W T Edwards, D M Donovan, K W Chang, J C Bayley, B E Fredrickson, H A Yuan.   

Abstract

The adequate reduction of vertebral burst fractures is dependent on successful application of distractive forces in combination with the restoration of normal spinal lordosis. However, the optimal sequence of distraction in comparison to distraction plus lordosis in the anatomic restoration of the fractured thoracolumbar spine has not been described. Burst fractures of the L1 vertebra were first created and the reduced in vitro using three differing reduction techniques. In six fresh human cadaver spine specimens, the mean fracture severity based on the degree of canal compromise was 31% (SD +/- 20%) after fracture. Reductions were performed using the AO Fixator Intern, the Reduction Fixation (RF) Device, and the Steffee plate systems following standard clinical techniques. The AO Fixator Intern provided independent but variable control of distraction and lordosis, the RF device provided variable distraction with independent, but preset, correction of lordosis and the Steffee system provided set distraction and stabilization. Both the AO and RF devices restored the lordosis (7.6 degrees +/- 5.2 degrees and 9.7 degrees +/- 4.5 degrees, respectively) better than the Steffee plate system (0 degrees +/- 1.6 degrees). However, the AO device provided poorest restoration of the posterior vertebral body height (92% vs 96% for the RF device and 99% for the Steffee plate). The RF device, which restored both lordosis and posterior vertebral body height to the near anatomic prefracture level, provided significantly better canal clearance (9% +/- 8%) than the other techniques, P < 0.05. The study demonstrates that instrumentation systems that provide independent correction of distraction and lordosis can best restore anatomic alignment, with indirect neurodecompression of the compromised spinal canal.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8441934

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  5 in total

1.  Biomechanics of human thoracolumbar spinal column trauma from vertical impact loading.

Authors:  Narayan Yoganandan; Mike W J Arun; Brian D Stemper; Frank A Pintar; Dennis J Maiman
Journal:  Ann Adv Automot Med       Date:  2013

2.  The effect of posterior instrumentation of the spine on canal dimensions and neurological recovery in thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures.

Authors:  S P Mohanty; Shyamasunder N Bhat; C Ishwara-Keerthi
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2011-03-10

3.  Pedicle screw fixation in thoracolumbar and lumbar spine assisted by lateral fluoroscopic imaging: a study to evaluate the accuracy of screw placement.

Authors:  S P Mohanty; S N Bhat; M Pai Kanhangad; G S Gosal
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-08-11

4.  Treatment of fractures and dislocations of the thoracic and lumbar spine by fusion and Harrington instrumentation.

Authors:  R Devilee; R Sanders; S de Lange
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Anterior D-rod and titanium mesh fixation for acute mid-lumbar burst fracture with incomplete neurologic deficits: A prospective study of 56 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Zhe-Yuan Huang; Zhen-Qi Ding; Hao-Yuan Liu; Jun Fang; Hui Liu; Mo Sha
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.251

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.