Literature DB >> 843921

Locomotor recovery after unilateral hindlimb deafferentation in cats.

M E Goldberger.   

Abstract

After hindlimb deafferentation, recovery of locomotor patterns may be distinguished from recovery of accurate movements. Cats were timed while crossing wide runways requiring that locomotion be present, and narrow runways which require that it also be accurate. Locomotion recovers soon after deafferentation and becomes almost normal in speed, although accuracy is still absent. This accuracy returns 10 days postoperatively. Ventral root afferents with cell bodies in dorsal root ganglia are unnecessary for recovery. Postural reflexes (and other non-topographic feedback) are used as cues for limb guidance after removal of that limb's topographic feedback. Anatomical experiments show that a thoracic root sprouts during the recovery period. This sprouting may increase the potency of postural reflexes. Although lower thoracic roots contribute to recovery, they are not essential. Ipsilateral descending system are essential, and represent the final common path for all recovery after deaffernting a hindlimb. Contralateral descending and afferent systems alone cannot mediate overground locomotion. Thus there is a difference between the systems which mediate overground locomotion and those used by animals in treadmill locomotion or with L-DOPA or clonidine or brain stem stimulation. The proposed mechanism underlying recovery of accurate locomotion is behavioral substitution which may be faciliated by collateral sprouting of relevant systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 843921     DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(77)90643-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  12 in total

1.  Positive force feedback in bouncing gaits?

Authors:  Hartmut Geyer; Andre Seyfarth; Reinhard Blickhan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Targeting myelin to optimize plasticity of spared spinal axons.

Authors:  Angela L M Scott; Leanne M Ramer; Lesley J J Soril; Jacek M Kwiecien; Matt S Ramer
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.590

Review 3.  Plasticity of connections underlying locomotor recovery after central and/or peripheral lesions in the adult mammals.

Authors:  Serge Rossignol
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Motoneuron intrinsic properties, but not their receptive fields, recover in chronic spinal injury.

Authors:  Michael D Johnson; Elma Kajtaz; Charlette M Cain; C J Heckman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Sprouting, regeneration and circuit formation in the injured spinal cord: factors and activity.

Authors:  Irin C Maier; Martin E Schwab
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Modifications of masticatory behavior after trigeminal deafferentation in the rabbit.

Authors:  T Inoue; T Kato; Y Masuda; T Nakamura; Y Kawamura; T Morimoto
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Spared-root deafferentation of a cat's hindlimb: hierarchical regulation of pathways mediating recovery of motor behavior.

Authors:  M E Goldberger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Partial and complete deafferentation of cat hindlimb: the contribution of behavioral substitution to recovery of motor function.

Authors:  M E Goldberger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Swimming in the rat: analysis of locomotor performance in comparison to stepping.

Authors:  J A Gruner; J Altman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Effects of deprivation of vision and vibrissae on goal-directed locomotion in cats.

Authors:  J Crémieux; C Veraart; M C Wanet-Defalque
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.