Literature DB >> 8437264

Endoscopic incision of ureteroceles: intravesical versus ectopic.

B Blyth1, G Passerini-Glazel, C Camuffo, H M Snyder, J W Duckett.   

Abstract

A total of 51 children, mostly less than 2 years old, underwent endoscopic incision of ureteroceles as a primary form of treatment. In 73% no further surgery was required. Of the patients 19 were diagnosed by prenatal ultrasound, with a urinary tract infection the usual presenting symptom in the remainder. Of 27 intravesical cases endoscopic incision resulted in decompression of the ureterocele in 93%, with preservation of upper pole function in 96%, and secondary surgical procedures were required in 7%. Reflux was created in 18% and it persisted in 2 of 4 patients. Of 24 cases of ectopic (extravesical) ureteroceles incision resulted in decompression in 75%, with upper pole function preserved in 50%. Reflux was created in 47% and a secondary surgical procedure was performed in 50%. Preservation of upper pole function was significantly better for intravesical versus ectopic ureteroceles (p < 0.01), and the requirement for secondary surgical procedure was greater with ectopic ureteroceles (p < 0.01). Three patients had intermittent bladder outlet obstruction following the incision and required further surgery. The 2 different techniques for incision of intravesical and ectopic ureteroceles are described. The role of endoscopic incision in the overall management of ureteroceles is confirmed by this review, and the need for partial nephroureterectomy may diminish.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8437264     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36146-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  13 in total

Review 1.  Obstructive ureterocele-an ongoing challenge.

Authors:  E Merlini; P Lelli Chiesa
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  39-year-old man with voiding symptoms.

Authors:  Claus G Roehrborn
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2004

3.  Ureteroceles in children: an ongoing challenge.

Authors:  G T Roy; S Desai; R C Cohen
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  Does endoscopic puncture of ureterocele provide not only an initial solution, but also a definitive treatment in all children? Over the 26 years of experience.

Authors:  Jaber Jawdat; Shachar Rotem; Stanislav Kocherov; Amicur Farkas; Boris Chertin
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 1.827

5.  [Hydronephrosis: urgency of interventions and recommended times for surgical correction].

Authors:  S Rogenhofer; S C Müller
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Transurethral incision as initial option in treatment guidelines for ectopic ureteroceles associated with duplex systems.

Authors:  Jee Soo Park; Yong Seung Lee; Cho Nyeong Lee; Sung Hoon Kim; Sang Woon Kim; Hyeyoung Lee; Sang Won Han
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Outcomes of endoscopic incision for the treatment of ureterocele in children at a single institution.

Authors:  James C Sander; Aylin N Bilgutay; Irina Stanasel; Chester J Koh; Nicolette Janzen; Edmond T Gonzales; David R Roth; Abhishek Seth
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Management and outcomes of ureteroceles in children: An experience of 25 years.

Authors:  Vishesh Jain; Sandeep Agarwala; Anjan Dhua; Aparajita Mitra; Deepak Mittal; Divya Murali; Devasenathipathy Kandasamy; Rakesh Kumar; Veereshwar Bhatnagar
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2021-04-01

9.  Transurethral incision of ureteroceles in paediatric age group.

Authors:  Hemanshi Shah; Charu Tiwari; Neha Sisodiya Shenoy; Pankaj Dwivedi; Suraj Gandhi
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-12-01

Review 10.  Management of the neonatal ureterocele.

Authors:  D E Coplen
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.