Literature DB >> 8435833

STIR imaging of synthetic vascular graft infection.

M E Hansen1, E K Yucel, A C Waltman.   

Abstract

Nine patients with suspected prosthetic vascular graft infection were studied with axial spin echo (SE) and short TI inversion recovery (STIR) magnetic resonance imaging. Images were assessed for presence and extent of abnormality. All patients had either surgical (8/9) or bacteriologic (6/9) confirmation of infection. STIR images better defined the extent of infection and had greater fat-fluid contrast than SE images in 6/9 studies. In 3 cases with peri-graft fluid alone, T2-weighted images had slightly greater contrast, although the STIR images were still diagnostic. STIR imaging can offer improved accuracy in evaluation of suspected prosthetic graft infection when used in conjunction with SE techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8435833     DOI: 10.1007/bf02603034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol        ISSN: 0174-1551            Impact factor:   2.740


  30 in total

1.  Rapid in vivo proton shimming.

Authors:  E Schneider; G Glover
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Prosthetic graft infection: limitations of indium white blood cell scanning.

Authors:  M C Brunner; R S Mitchell; J C Baldwin; D R James; C Olcott; J T Mehigan; I R McDougall; D C Miller
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Aortoenteric fistula and perigraft infection: evaluation with CT.

Authors:  R N Low; S D Wall; R B Jeffrey; R A Sollitto; L M Reilly; L M Tierney
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Multisection fat-water imaging with chemical shift selective presaturation.

Authors:  P J Keller; W W Hunter; P Schmalbrock
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Blood flow: magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  W G Bradley; V Waluch
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Infected aortoiliofemoral grafts: magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  E Justich; E G Amparo; H Hricak; C B Higgins
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Infected prosthetic grafts.

Authors:  R E Casali; W E Tucker; B W Thompson; R C Read
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1980-05

8.  Natural history of periprosthetic air on computerized axial tomographic examination of the abdomen following abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  P J O'Hara; G P Borkowski; N R Hertzer; P B O'Donovan; S L Brigham; E G Beven
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Computerized tomographic assessment of graft incorporation after aortic reconstruction.

Authors:  P G Qvarfordt; L M Reilly; A S Mark; J Goldstone; S D Wall; W K Ehrenfeld; R J Stoney
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Detection of abdominal aortic graft infection: comparison of CT and in-labeled white blood cell scans.

Authors:  A S Mark; S M McCarthy; A A Moss; D Price
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  1 in total

1.  Evidence-based guideline of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) on imaging infection in vascular grafts.

Authors:  Chiara Lauri; Alberto Signore; Andor W J M Glaudemans; Giorgio Treglia; Olivier Gheysens; Riemer H J A Slart; Roberto Iezzi; Niek H J Prakken; Eike Sebastian Debus; Susanne Honig; Anne Lejay; Nabil Chakfé
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 10.057

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.