Literature DB >> 8434324

Initial-impression diagnosis using low-back pain patient pain drawings.

N H Mann1, M D Brown, D B Hertz, I Enger, J Tompkins.   

Abstract

Patient pain drawings were blindly selected from five lumbar spine disorder categories. The drawings were classified by low-back physicians, discriminant analysis, and several computerized artificial neural network configurations. The purpose was to determine the reliability of the patient pain drawing when diagnosing low-back disorders and to delineate the pain mark patterns particular to each disorder by comparing physicians with computerized methods. The physicians averaged 51% accuracy with individual preferences for certain disorder groups. The computerized methods demonstrated comparable accuracy (48%) and more agreement in classification. Associations were found between the predicted pain patterns for each diagnostic group made by an expert and the patterns generated by computerized methods. Variances in these associations are instructive to clinicians for making accurate predictions of diagnosis from pain drawings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8434324     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199301000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  15 in total

1.  Pearls: Patient-generated Pain Drawings.

Authors:  Mark D Brown
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Disorders characterised by pain: a methodological review of population surveys.

Authors:  H Raspe; T Kohlmann
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Back pain and total hip arthroplasty: a prospective natural history study.

Authors:  Javad Parvizi; Aidin E Pour; Alan Hillibrand; Grigory Goldberg; Peter F Sharkey; Richard H Rothman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Colored Pain Drawing as a Clinical Tool in Differentiating Neuropathic Pain from Non-Neuropathic Pain.

Authors:  Nalini Sehgal; Debra B Gordon; Scott Hetzel; Miroslav Misha Backonja
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 3.750

5.  Pain 5 years after instrumented and non-instrumented posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion.

Authors:  Thomas Andersen; Finn B Christensen; Ebbe S Hansen; Cody Bünger
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-05-20       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Pain drawing in the evaluation of low back pain.

Authors:  K Takata; H Hirotani
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  What characterizes people who have an unclear classification using a treatment-based classification algorithm for low back pain? A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Tasha R Stanton; Mark J Hancock; Adri T Apeldoorn; Benedict M Wand; Julie M Fritz
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2012-11-08

8.  Pragmatic application of a clinical prediction rule in primary care to identify patients with low back pain with a good prognosis following a brief spinal manipulation intervention.

Authors:  Julie M Fritz; John D Childs; Timothy W Flynn
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  Computerized assessment of pain drawing area: A pilot study.

Authors:  Anna Wenngren; Britt-Marie Stålnacke
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 2.570

10.  Pain drawings in somatoform-functional pain.

Authors:  Niklaus Egloff; Rafael J A Cámara; Roland von Känel; Nicole Klingler; Elizabeth Marti; Marie-Louise Gander Ferrari
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.