Literature DB >> 8434322

A randomized, double-blind study to compare low-dose with standard-dose chymopapain in the treatment of herniated lumbar intervertebral discs.

M Benoist1, J F Bonneville, B Lassale, M Runge, C Gillard, J Vazquez-Suarez, A Deburge.   

Abstract

Postoperative low-back pain and spasm are the main drawbacks of chymopapain chemonucleolysis. To investigate if low-dose chymopapain could reduce this adverse reaction, without modifying the efficacy, 118 patients with persistent low-back and radicular pain due to a lumbar disc herniation underwent chemonucleolysis. 60 patients were randomly selected to receive 2 mL of standard-dose chymopapain (4,000 units) and 58 to receive 2 mL of low dose (2,000 units). The clinical outcome was assessed on study days 1, 30, and 60, and after 1 year by physicians who were unaware of the treatment, and on the basis of the patients' self evaluation. At day 60, Chemonucleolysis was rated as successful in 81% of the cases by the investigator and in 80% by the patient's self assessment. The percentage of good results was remarkably similar in the two treatment groups and this finding was confirmed after 1 year. There was some evidence that the low-dose treatment resulted in less frequent postoperative back pain but the difference was not statistically significant. Moreover, a comparable incidence of acute low-back pain and spasm was observed in the two treatment groups. Low-dose chemonucleolysis appears to be as effective as the standard dose, but the use of 2,000 units does not significantly lower the postoperative back pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8434322     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199301000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Nucleolysis in the herniated disk].

Authors:  T Lehnert; S Mundackatharappel; W Schwarz; S Bisdas; A Wetter; C Herzog; J O Balzer; M G Mack; T J Vogl
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  Outcome of invasive treatment modalities on back pain and sciatica: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Maurits W van Tulder; Bart Koes; Seppo Seitsalo; Antti Malmivaara
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Surgical interventions for lumbar disc prolapse.

Authors:  J N A Gibson; G Waddell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-04-18

4.  Chemonucleolysis: correlation of results with the size of the herniation and the dimensions of the spinal canal.

Authors:  C Garreau; I Dessarts; B Lassale; G Morvan; A Deburge; M Benoist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Brain Activation in a Cynomolgus Macaque Model of Chymopapain-Induced Discogenic Low Back Pain: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Hiroki Ushirozako; Go Yoshida; Daisuke Togawa; Takao Omura; Tomohiko Hasegawa; Yu Yamato; Tomohiro Banno; Hideyuki Arima; Shin Oe; Yuki Mihara; Tomohiro Yamada; Takahiro Natsume; Shinya Ogawa; Yuji Awaga; Hiroyuki Takamatsu; Yukihiro Matsuyama
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2019-04-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.