Literature DB >> 8434321

Does microscopic removal of lumbar disc herniation lead to better results than the standard procedure? Results of a one-year randomized study.

T Tullberg1, J Isacson, L Weidenhielm.   

Abstract

Sixty patients with single-level lumbar disc herniation confirmed by computerized tomography were studied in a randomized prospective study. The aim was to see if there was any difference between the microscopic removal of a disc herniation and the standard procedure. All patients were operated on by the same surgeon by either method. They were all followed up by an impartial observer at 3 weeks, 2 months, 6 months, and 1 year. There were no differences between the groups regarding perioperative bleeding, complications, inpatient stay, time off work, or end result. The authors concluded that the decision to use the operating microscope may be left to the surgeon, because it had no effect on the short-term results or those at 1 year.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8434321     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199301000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  28 in total

1.  Hospital pricing reform in the public health care system--an empirical case study from Finland.

Authors:  Hennamari Mikkola
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2003-12

2.  Clinical outcomes of patients with lumbar disc herniation, selected for one-level open-discectomy and microdiscectomy.

Authors:  Kotryna Veresciagina; Bronius Spakauskas; Kazys Vytautas Ambrozaitis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Outcome of invasive treatment modalities on back pain and sciatica: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Maurits W van Tulder; Bart Koes; Seppo Seitsalo; Antti Malmivaara
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Surgical interventions for lumbar disc prolapse.

Authors:  J N A Gibson; G Waddell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-04-18

Review 5.  Herniated lumbar disc.

Authors:  Jo Jordan; Kika Konstantinou; John O'Dowd
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2009-03-26

Review 6.  Herniated lumbar disc.

Authors:  Jo Jordan; Kika Konstantinou; John O'Dowd
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2011-06-28

7.  A history of lumbar disc herniation from Hippocrates to the 1990s.

Authors:  Eeric Truumees
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The safety and efficacy of minimally invasive discectomy: a meta-analysis of prospective randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Xian Chang; Bin Chen; Hai-yin Li; Xiao-bo Han; Yue Zhou; Chang-qing Li
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 9.  Sciatica: what the rheumatologist needs to know.

Authors:  Maurits van Tulder; Wilco Peul; Bart Koes
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 20.543

10.  Evaluation of standard nucleotomy for lumbar disc herniation using the Love method: results of follow-up studies after more than 10 years.

Authors:  Yasuo Saruhashi; Kanji Mori; Akitomo Katsuura; Shinobu Takahashi; Yoshitaka Matsusue; Sinsuke Hukuda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.