Literature DB >> 8434309

Automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy versus chemonucleolysis in the treatment of sciatica. A randomized multicenter trial.

M Revel1, C Payan, C Vallee, J D Laredo, B Lassale, C Roux, H Carter, C Salomon, E Delmas, J Roucoules.   

Abstract

A randomized clinical trial was conducted to compare the results of automated percutaneous discectomy with those of chemonucleolysis in 141 patients with sciatica caused by a disk herniation; 69 underwent automated percutaneous discectomy and 72 were subjected to chemonucleolysis. The principle outcome was the overall assessment of the patient 6 months after treatment. Treatment was considered to be successful by 61% of the patients in the chemonucleolysis group compared with 44% in the automated percutaneous discectomy group. At 1-year follow-up, overall success rates were 66% in the chemonucleolysis group and 37% in the automated percutaneous group. Within 6 months of treatment, 7% of the patients in the chemonucleolysis group and 33% in the discectomy group underwent subsequent open surgery. The complication rates of both treatment groups were low, with the exception of a high rate of low-back pain in the chemonucleolysis group (42%). The results of this trial confirm previous controlled studies on chemonucleolysis and suggest that controlled studies should be carried out before automated percutaneous discectomy can be considered a useful intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8434309     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199301000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  15 in total

1.  Measuring the effect of novel therapies for back pain.

Authors:  Victor M Haughton; Jason Fine
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Chemonucleolysis versus surgical discectomy for sciatica secondary to lumbar disc herniation. A cost and quality-of-life evaluation.

Authors:  R Launois; B Henry; J R Marty; M Gersberg; C Lassale; M Benoist; J M Goehrs
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  [Nucleolysis in the herniated disk].

Authors:  T Lehnert; S Mundackatharappel; W Schwarz; S Bisdas; A Wetter; C Herzog; J O Balzer; M G Mack; T J Vogl
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 4.  Outcome of invasive treatment modalities on back pain and sciatica: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Maurits W van Tulder; Bart Koes; Seppo Seitsalo; Antti Malmivaara
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Surgical interventions for lumbar disc prolapse.

Authors:  J N A Gibson; G Waddell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-04-18

6.  Cohort study of lumbar percutaneous chemonucleolysis using ethanol gel in sciatica refractory to conservative treatment.

Authors:  Sébastien Touraine; Joël Damiano; Olivia Tran; Jean-Denis Laredo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous automated lumbar nucleotomy. Comparison with traditional macro-procedure discectomy.

Authors:  R Dullerud; H Lie; B Magnæs
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 1.610

Review 8.  The evidence on surgical interventions for low back disorders, an overview of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Wilco C H Jacobs; Sidney M Rubinstein; Paul C Willems; Wouter A Moojen; Ferran Pellisé; Cumhur F Oner; Wilco C Peul; Maurits W van Tulder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Percutaneous discectomy--update.

Authors:  E H Frank
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1995-03

10.  Surgery for herniated lumbar discs: a literature synthesis.

Authors:  R M Hoffman; K J Wheeler; R A Deyo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.