Literature DB >> 8433363

Negative supercoiling and nucleosome cores. I. The effect of negative supercoiling on the efficiency of nucleosome core formation in vitro.

H G Patterton1, C von Holt.   

Abstract

The efficiency of nucleosome core formation in vitro as a function of DNA topology was investigated. We show that the reconstitution of nucleosome cores by urea/salt dialysis on both negatively supercoiled and linearized plasmid proceed co-operatively, and that negatively supercoiled molecules are reconstituted significantly more efficiently compared with linearized molecules. The free energy of supercoiling, related to the square of the linking deficit, is further shown to be sufficient to account for this difference, which is particularly pronounced at low molar reconstitution ratios of octamer: DNA. At these low molar ratios the average number of cores formed per negatively supercoiled molecule is equal to the input ratio of octamer: DNA, in contrast to linearized molecules, where few if any cores are reconstituted under identical experimental conditions. The possible contribution of supercoil-stabilized non-B-DNA structural transitions to differences in core-DNA interactions on supercoiled and linearized DNA was also investigated. We show that the change in the nuclease susceptibility of a d(A-G).d(C-T) run in the free and reconstituted supercoiled plasmid is consistent with the reversion of the poly(purine).poly(pyrimidine) stretch from an H-DNA form to a B-DNA form following reconstitution of the negatively supercoiled plasmid into nucleosome cores. The biological significance of the supercoil-dependent efficiency of core formation is discussed, and the results related to other work.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8433363     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  11 in total

1.  Chromatin rearrangements in the prnD-prnB bidirectional promoter: dependence on transcription factors.

Authors:  Irene García; Ramón Gonzalez; Dennis Gómez; Claudio Scazzocchio
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2004-02

2.  Homologous pairing in stretched supercoiled DNA.

Authors:  T R Strick; V Croquette; D Bensimon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Behavior of supercoiled DNA.

Authors:  T R Strick; J F Allemand; D Bensimon; V Croquette
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  The translational placement of nucleosome cores in vitro determines the access of the transacting factor suGF1 to DNA.

Authors:  H G Patterton; J Hapgood
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1996-11-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 5.  Emerging roles for R-loop structures in the management of topological stress.

Authors:  Frederic Chedin; Craig J Benham
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Purification of an oligo(dG).oligo(dC)-binding sea urchin nuclear protein, suGF1: a family of G-string factors involved in gene regulation during development.

Authors:  J Hapgood; D Patterton
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  suGF1 binds in the major groove of its oligo(dG).oligo(dC) recognition sequence and is excluded by a positioned nucleosome core.

Authors:  D Patterton; J Hapgood
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Negative supercoil at gene boundaries modulates gene topology.

Authors:  Yathish Jagadheesh Achar; Mohamood Adhil; Ramveer Choudhary; Nick Gilbert; Marco Foiani
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Antibody-targeted chromatin enables effective intracellular delivery and functionality of CRISPR/Cas9 expression plasmids.

Authors:  Tobias Killian; Annette Buntz; Teresa Herlet; Heike Seul; Olaf Mundigl; Gernot Längst; Ulrich Brinkmann
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  DNA topoisomerase III localizes to centromeres and affects centromeric CENP-A levels in fission yeast.

Authors:  Ulrika Norman-Axelsson; Mickaël Durand-Dubief; Punit Prasad; Karl Ekwall
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.