Literature DB >> 8433118

Likelihood ratios for continuous test results--making the clinicians' job easier or harder?

D L Simel1, G P Samsa, D B Matchar.   

Abstract

Clinicians' paradigms for considering diagnostic test results require decisions based on the actual test value. However, when the test result is reported on a continuous scale each possible outcome may not result in unique actions. To simplify decision making, clinicians often break down the continuous scale into dichotomous or ordered outcomes. Likelihood ratios, reported with the test outcome, help summarize the impact of diagnostic tests. Although commonly applied to dichotomous outcomes, likelihood ratios can also be applied to ordinal or continuous results. This application allows investigators to consider the effect of clinically simplifying continuous data into dichotomous or ordinal categories. The parameters of a simple logistic regression equation summarize continuous likelihood ratios, evaluate covariates, generate likelihood ratio lines, and help assess the statistical significance of more complex models. Having visually inspected likelihood ratio lines and considered statistical differences, the investigator should choose the test report format that best accounts the realities driving clinical decisions.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8433118     DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90012-p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  8 in total

1.  Interpreting results of prostate-specific antigen testing for early detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  J B Meigs; M J Barry; J E Oesterling; S J Jacobsen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Fractional anisotropy of cerebral white matter and thickness of cortical gray matter across the lifespan.

Authors:  P Kochunov; D C Glahn; J Lancaster; P M Thompson; V Kochunov; B Rogers; P Fox; J Blangero; D E Williamson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Improving the prediction of complex diseases by testing for multiple disease-susceptibility genes.

Authors:  Quanhe Yang; Muin J Khoury; Lorenzo Botto; J M Friedman; W Dana Flanders
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-02-14       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma using a scoring system: combined assay of serological markers of Helicobacter pylori infection, pepsinogen I and gastrin.

Authors:  J T Lin; W C Lee; M S Wu; J T Wang; T H Wang; C J Chen
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 7.527

5.  Non-differential measurement error does not always bias diagnostic likelihood ratios towards the null.

Authors:  G T Fosgate
Journal:  Emerg Themes Epidemiol       Date:  2006-07-17

6.  Serum biomarker gMS-Classifier2: predicting conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Georgina Arrambide; Carmen Espejo; Jennifer Yarden; Ella Fire; Larissa Spector; Nir Dotan; Avinoam Dukler; Alex Rovira; Xavier Montalban; Mar Tintore
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Routine ultrasound examination by OB/GYN residents increase the accuracy of diagnosis for emergency surgery in gynecology.

Authors:  Flavie Toret-Labeeuw; Cyrille Huchon; Thomas Popowski; Anne A Chantry; Alexandre Dumont; Arnaud Fauconnier
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Application of a stratum-specific likelihood ratio analysis in a screen for depression among a community-dwelling population in Japan.

Authors:  Norio Sugawara; Ayako Kaneda; Ippei Takahashi; Shigeyuki Nakaji; Norio Yasui-Furukori
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 2.570

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.