Literature DB >> 8431587

Measuring functional status of stroke patients with the Sickness Impact Profile.

J Schuling1, J Greidanus, B Meyboom-de Jong.   

Abstract

Measuring outcome of stroke treatment has focused mostly on Activities of Daily Living. In our study we investigated the impact of stroke on the patient's daily life and the course of functional status over time. A community-based cohort of stroke patients was examined with the Barthel ADL Index and the Sickness Impact Profile at fixed intervals post-stroke. Data were compared with those of an elderly control group in the community. The scores of the stroke group on all the subscales of the SIP were much worse than in the control group. The differences were greatest for house management, recreation/pastime and mobility. While there was significant improvement of the mean Barthel score between 8 and 26 weeks post-stroke, the mean SIP scores at these intervals did not change, with the exception of the subscale house management, which showed some improvement. It would appear that the impact of stroke on daily life is greatest in the fields of house management, recreation/pastime and mobility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8431587     DOI: 10.3109/09638289309165864

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil        ISSN: 0963-8288            Impact factor:   3.033


  7 in total

1.  Socioeconomic variations in the course of stroke: unequal health outcomes, equal care?

Authors:  G A M van den Bos; J P J M Smits; G P Westert; A van Straten
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  The SIP68: an abbreviated sickness impact profile for disability outcomes research.

Authors:  Upasana Nanda; Patricia M McLendon; Elena M Andresen; Eric Armbrecht
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Health assessment for chronic HCV infection: results of quality of life.

Authors:  R L Carithers; D Sugano; M Bayliss
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness.

Authors:  H Beckerman; M E Roebroeck; G J Lankhorst; J G Becher; P D Bezemer; A L Verbeek
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  Critical review of the international assessments of health-related quality of life.

Authors:  R T Anderson; N K Aaronson; D Wilkin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 6.  Economic and health-related quality of life considerations of new therapies in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  L M Rubenstein; A DeLeo; E A Chrischilles
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  The case for using the repeatability coefficient when calculating test-retest reliability.

Authors:  Sharmila Vaz; Torbjörn Falkmer; Anne Elizabeth Passmore; Richard Parsons; Pantelis Andreou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.