Literature DB >> 8431238

Effects of examinee gender, standardized-patient gender, and their interaction on standardized patients' ratings of examinees' interpersonal and communication skills.

J A Colliver1, N V Vu, M L Marcy, T A Travis, R S Robbs.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the effects of examinee gender, standardized-patient (SP) gender, and, in particular, their interaction on ratings made by SPs of examinees' interpersonal and communication skills in a performance-based examination of clinical competence.
METHOD: The examination was administered to four classes of senior medical students (about 70 per class) at Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, 1988-1991. The skill dimensions tested were clarity of communication, thoroughness of explanation, professional manner, personal manner, and overall patient satisfaction. Split-plot analyses of variance were used.
RESULTS: There was no interaction of examinee gender and SP gender for any of the five rating scales. There was no main effect of examinee gender for four of the five scales; however, for personal manner, women students were rated slightly higher than men students. There was a main effect of SP gender, but the effect was not consistent from rating scale to rating scale or from class to class. Nevertheless, differences in ratings given by men and women SPs should not be of psychometric concern, since the ratings of men and women examinees are necessarily affected alike.
CONCLUSIONS: Except for the women examinee's higher performance in personal manner, the men and women examinees generally performed equally well with respect to interpersonal and communication skills, and they performed equally well regardless of the gender of the SP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8431238     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199302000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  6 in total

Review 1.  Differences in clinical communication by gender.

Authors:  V Elderkin-Thompson; H Waitzkin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Virtual standardized patients: an interactive method to examine variation in depression care among primary care physicians.

Authors:  Lisa M Hooper; Kevin P Weinfurt; Lisa A Cooper; Julie Mensh; William Harless; Melissa C Kuhajda; Steven A Epstein
Journal:  Prim Health Care Res Dev       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 1.458

3.  Virtual humans versus standardized patients: which lead residents to more correct diagnoses?

Authors:  Adam L Wendling; Shivashankar Halan; Patrick Tighe; Linda Le; Tammy Euliano; Benjamin Lok
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Effect of evaluator and resident gender on the American Board of Internal Medicine evaluation scores.

Authors:  V E Rand; E S Hudes; W S Browner; R M Wachter; A L Avins
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Passing MRCP (UK) PACES: a cross-sectional study examining the performance of doctors by sex and country.

Authors:  Emily Unwin; Henry W W Potts; Jane Dacre; Andrew Elder; Katherine Woolf
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Examiner effect on the objective structured clinical exam - a study at five medical schools.

Authors:  Iris Schleicher; Karsten Leitner; Jana Juenger; Andreas Moeltner; Miriam Ruesseler; Bernd Bender; Jasmina Sterz; Karl-Friedrich Schuettler; Sarah Koenig; Joachim Gerhard Kreuder
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 2.463

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.