Literature DB >> 8430714

Can moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease be diagnosed by historical and physical findings alone?

R G Badgett1, D J Tanaka, D K Hunt, M J Jelley, L E Feinberg, J F Steiner, T L Petty.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The value of the history and physical examination in diagnosing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is uncertain. This study was undertaken to determine the best clinical predictors of COPD and to define the incremental changes in the ability to diagnose COPD that occur when the physical examination findings and then the peak flowmeter results are added to the pulmonary history. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Ninety-two outpatients with a self-reported history of cigarette smoking or COPD completed a pulmonary history questionnaire and received peak flow and spirometric testing. The subjects were independently examined for 12 physical signs by 4 internists blinded to all other results. Multivariate analyses identified independent predictors of clinically significant, moderate COPD, defined as a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) less than 60% of the predicted value or a FEV1/FVC (forced vital capacity) less than 60%.
RESULTS: Fifteen subjects (16%) had moderate COPD. Two historical variables from the questionnaire--previous diagnosis of COPD and smoking (70 or more pack-years)--significantly entered a logistic regression model that diagnosed COPD with a sensitivity of 40% and a specificity of 100%. Only the physical sign of diminished breath sounds significantly added to the historical model to yield a mean sensitivity of 67% and a mean specificity of 98%. The peak flow result (best cutoff value was less than 200 L/min) significantly added to the models of only one of the four physicians for a mean final sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 95%. Subjects with none of the three historical and physical variables had a 3% prevalence of COPD; this prevalence was unchanged by adding the peak flow results.
CONCLUSIONS: Diminished breath sounds were the best predictor of moderate COPD. A sequential increase in sensitivity and a minimal decrease in specificity occurred when the quality of breath sounds was added first to the medical history, followed by the peak flow result. The chance of COPD was very unlikely with a normal history and physical examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8430714     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(93)90182-o

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  18 in total

1.  Simplifying likelihood ratios.

Authors:  Steven McGee
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  The outpatient diagnosis and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: pharmacotherapy, administration of supplemental oxygen, and smoking cessation techniques.

Authors:  R M Schapira; L F Reinke
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Screening for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in an Urban HIV Clinic: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Daniel K Shirley; Robert J Kaner; Marshall J Glesby
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 5.078

Review 4.  Discharge of the asthmatic patient.

Authors:  B A Markoff; J F MacMillan; V Kumra
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 8.667

5.  [Spirometry as method of screening and intervention in high- risk smokers in primary care].

Authors:  Joan Clotet; Jordi Real; Iñigo Lorente; Araceli Fuentes; Eugeni Paredes; Carmen Ciria
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 1.137

6.  Physiological and radiological characterisation of patients diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care.

Authors:  C O'Brien; P J Guest; S L Hill; R A Stockley
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 9.139

7.  Accuracy of history, wheezing, and forced expiratory time in the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Sharon E Straus; Finlay A McAlister; David L Sackett; Jonathan J Deeks
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Potential for lung sound monitoring during bronchial provocation testing.

Authors:  A B Bohadana; R Peslin; H Uffholtz; G Pauli
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 9.139

9.  Accuracy of symptoms, signs, and C-reactive protein for early chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Berna D L Broekhuizen; Alfred P E Sachs; Theo J Verheij; Kristel J M Janssen; Gerard Asma; Jan-Willem J Lammers; René Hage; Ernst Lammers; Arno W Hoes; Karel G Moons
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  [Lung sounds can be used as an indicator for assessing severity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at the initial diagnosis].

Authors:  Shifeng Chen; Minyu Huang; Xianru Peng; Yafei Yuan; Shuyu Huang; Yanmei Ye; Wenqu Zhao; Bohou Li; Huishan Han; Shuluan Yang; Shaoxi Cai; Haijin Zhao
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2020-02-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.